California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB754

Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
3/11/21  
Refer
3/15/21  
Report Pass
4/15/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Refer
6/16/21  

Caption

Sustainable groundwater management: groundwater sustainability plan.

Impact

If passed, AB 754 would allow for greater flexibility for local agencies to manage their groundwater resources effectively. The extension can assist agencies that are struggling to create sustainable groundwater plans, ensuring that they are not penalized if delays arise from unforeseen circumstances. The bill promotes thorough planning and compliance with sustainable standards by offering more time while maintaining the goal of groundwater sustainability.

Summary

AB 754, introduced by Assembly Member Mathis, aims to amend specific sections of the California Water Code that relate to groundwater management. The bill is designed to enhance the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act by providing local agencies the ability to request an extension up to 180 days to comply with the requirements for managing high- and medium-priority groundwater basins under sustainability plans. This adjustment is crucial for areas where agencies face challenges in developing these plans by the tightly prescribed deadlines.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards AB 754 appears to be largely supportive among stakeholders who recognize the importance of providing local agencies with more time. Proponents highlight the necessity of careful planning to avoid future overdraft conditions, which can lead to detrimental impacts on water supply. Critics, while fewer, may argue that extensions could delay necessary actions towards immediate water sustainability, leaving some basins vulnerable to overdraft conditions.

Contention

A noteworthy point of contention relates to the criteria under which extensions can be granted, as well as the definition of 'critical conditions' in the context of groundwater basins. Some legislators may express concerns that allowing extensions could lead to inaction or complacency among local agencies, potentially undermining the urgency that the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act intended to instill. The proposed changes accentuate the ongoing debate about how best to balance regulation with agency capabilities in achieving substantial groundwater management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB828

Sustainable groundwater management: managed wetlands.

CA AB2201

Groundwater sustainability agency: groundwater extraction permit: verification.

CA SB252

Water wells.

CA SB315

Groundwater: groundwater sustainability agencies: probationary basins.

CA AB252

Floating home marinas: rent caps.

CA AB336

State parks: park entrance fees: waivers: 4th grade children.

CA AB2528

Williamson Act contracts: cancellation: energy projects.