California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB852

Introduced
2/17/21  
Introduced
2/17/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
4/20/21  
Report Pass
4/20/21  
Refer
4/22/21  
Report Pass
5/5/21  
Engrossed
5/24/21  
Engrossed
5/24/21  
Refer
5/25/21  
Refer
5/25/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Refer
8/8/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Refer
8/29/22  
Refer
8/29/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Chaptered
9/25/22  
Chaptered
9/25/22  
Passed
9/25/22  

Caption

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

Impact

The amendment directly affects the Business and Professions Code, specifically regarding health care practitioners' obligations and pharmacies' roles in dispensing medications. By prohibiting pharmacies from refusing to fulfill electronic prescriptions based solely on software incompatibility, the bill aims to streamline the prescription process, thereby enhancing efficiency and accessibility for patients. This shift aligns with broader initiatives to digitize healthcare practices and improve prescription management systems.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 852 amends existing regulations concerning electronic prescriptions within California's healthcare framework. The bill mandates that healthcare practitioners authorized to issue prescriptions must be equipped to send prescriptions via electronic data transmission to pharmacies chosen by patients. It emphasizes the adoption of electronic prescriptions as the default mode of communication in healthcare, with specified exceptions being recognized to address technical failures or other circumstances.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 852 is positive among proponents who believe that electronic prescriptions are vital for ensuring a more efficient healthcare system. However, there are apprehensions regarding the software standards and technical requirements detailed in the bill, which some stakeholders argue could pose challenges for smaller pharmacies or those with limited technological resources. Concerns about the implications of mandated compliance and potential administrative burdens have been highlighted by detractors.

Contention

Key points of contention within the discussions of AB 852 revolve around the capability of all pharmacies to meet the mandated electronic transmission requirements without compromising service quality. There is also debate on how effectively the exceptions for non-compliance outlined in the bill will function, particularly in emergency scenarios or rural areas. Furthermore, while the bill seeks to enhance patient choice in pharmacy services, some dissenters warn of the potential for technical issues and the resultant impact on patient care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA SB1240

Prescription drugs: CURES database.

CT SB00135

An Act Concerning Revisions To Pharmacy And Drug Control Statutes.

CT HB07159

An Act Addressing Opioid Use.

CA AB1503

Pharmacy.

KS SB121

Broadening the scope of practice of naturopathic doctors and changing certain provisions pertaining to the licensure and regulation of naturopathic doctors.

KS HB2366

Expanding the scope of practice of naturopathic doctors, specifying continuing education requirements, increasing the required amount of professional liability insurance and modifying certain provisions relating to the licensure and regulations of naturopathic doctors.

KS SB496

Expanding the scope of practice of naturopathic doctors, specifying continuing education requirements, increasing the required amount of professional liability insurance and modifying certain provisions relating to the licensure and regulations of naturopathic doctors.