California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB854

Introduced
2/17/21  
Introduced
2/17/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Refer
1/14/22  
Refer
1/14/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  

Caption

Residential real property: withdrawal of accommodations.

Impact

The implications of AB 854 are significant in shaping housing policy across California. By ensuring that owners must have held properties for a minimum duration, the bill enhances tenant stability and provides a safeguard against the rapid turnover of rental accommodations. This legislative change is crucial in areas where housing supply is limited, as it aims to retain existing rental units in the market, thereby addressing the ongoing housing crisis.

Summary

Assembly Bill 854 seeks to amend the existing laws surrounding the withdrawal of residential accommodations in California, specifically targeting legislative gaps identified in the Ellis Act. The bill aims to implement restrictions on property owners wishing to withdraw accommodations from the rental market, particularly when local laws impose rent control. Under AB 854, owners who wish to file a notice to withdraw must demonstrate continuous ownership for at least five years, thus deterring property speculation and protecting tenants from sudden evictions.

Sentiment

Discussions around AB 854 have been polarized, reflecting broader conversations on housing and tenant rights. Proponents of the bill, including several tenant advocacy groups, argue that it is a necessary step towards reinforcing tenant protections against arbitrary evictions and maintaining affordable housing stock. Conversely, some property owners and real estate stakeholders express concerns that it could discourage investment in residential properties, potentially leading to a decline in housing quality and availability.

Contention

While AB 854 seeks to bolster tenant protections, it faces contention primarily from property owners who feel that the restrictions on withdrawing accommodations overstep property rights. The bill's requirement for prolonged ownership before exercising withdrawal rights has raised concerns about its long-term impact on ownership flexibility. Critics argue that such regulations might dissuade future investment in residential properties, complicating efforts to enhance housing availability in the face of California's escalating housing crisis.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2050

Residential real property: withdrawal of accommodations.

CA SB222

Discrimination: veteran or military status.

CA AB446

Discrimination: housing: victims of domestic violence.

CA SB1427

Discrimination: veteran or military status.

CA AB2364

Rental control: withdraw from accommodation.

MA H2022

Relative to prohibiting eviction without good cause

CA SB403

Discrimination on the basis of ancestry.

CA AB982

Residential real property: rent control: withdrawal of accommodations.