California Assembly Bill AB887

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/21
• Refer: 2/25/21
• Report Pass: 3/11/21
• Refer: 3/15/21
• Report Pass: 3/16/21
• Refer: 3/17/21
• Report Pass: 3/23/21
• Refer: 3/23/21
• Refer: 4/14/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 5/27/21
• Refer: 5/28/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/14/21
• Refer: 6/14/21
• Report Pass: 6/23/21
• Refer: 6/23/21
• Refer: 7/5/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/9/21
• Chaptered: 10/8/21
• Passed: 10/8/21

Caption

Domestic violence: restraining orders.

Impact

The bill's enactment will amend California's Family Code by adding Sections 6306.5 and 6306.6, specifically pertaining to domestic violence. As a result of this change, litigants seeking restraining orders will benefit from a more efficient and user-friendly system. The Judicial Council is tasked with developing or amending necessary rules and forms to implement these provisions effectively. This is expected to enhance the support available to those at risk of domestic violence, ensuring they have better access to legal protection.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 887, introduced by Assemblymember Levine, focuses on improving the process for obtaining domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) and temporary restraining orders (TROs) in California. The bill allows petitioners to submit applications electronically, thereby streamlining the process and making it more accessible to individuals in need. Additionally, it provides options for petitioners to receive important documents via mail or electronically, eliminating the financial burden typically associated with filing such petitions by waiving any associated fees.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 887 appears to be positive, as it is received as a legislative effort aimed at aiding victims of domestic violence by simplifying legal processes. Stakeholders such as domestic violence advocacy groups likely support the bill due to its potential to enhance access to justice for vulnerable individuals. However, particular details regarding the operational implementation of the electronic system and resources could raise discussions among legal practitioners about the adequacy of these changes.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the bill's dependence on future appropriations for the evolution of these electronic systems. The requirement for an appropriation means that while the legislative intention is clear, the actual implementation could face delays if funding is not secured. Additionally, the requirement that information regarding self-help services be clearly displayed on court websites reflects ongoing discussions about ensuring that victims have the resources and information necessary to navigate the legal system independently.