State government: travel.
If enacted, AB 929 would fundamentally change how licensed establishments manage the areas they can operate in, making permanent temporary catering authorizations that were previously granted under emergency COVID-19 measures. By formalizing this process, the bill could help bolster the hospitality sector by easing regulations on outdoor and adjacent spaces used for dining and social gatherings, thereby potentially increasing revenue for businesses affected by the pandemic.
Assembly Bill 929, introduced by Assembly Member Levine, seeks to amend the Business and Professions Code to allow licensees with on-sale general licenses or winegrowers licenses to apply for an extension of their licensed premises. This bill is particularly important as it would address areas that may be included in an extension, such as outdoor spaces accessible from the licensed premises, parking lots, and other adjacent areas. The focus of AB 929 is to streamline the process for establishments wishing to expand the areas where they can serve alcoholic beverages, ensuring they can accommodate customers more effectively, especially post-COVID-19 restrictions.
The sentiment surrounding AB 929 appears to be largely supportive from those in the hospitality and business sectors, who advocate for the easing of restrictions that have hampered their operations. Proponents argue that this bill will support economic recovery by allowing businesses to better utilize their available space, thereby improving customer experiences. However, there may be concerns voiced by local governments or community members about the implications of increased alcohol service in expanded areas and the enforcement of regulations in these new spaces.
A point of contention may arise over how local jurisdictions manage the newly extended areas for alcohol service, particularly in terms of zoning and public safety. The bill requires licensees to provide documentation about their control over the proposed areas, which could lead to debates over compliance and oversight. Additionally, the section addressing state-sponsored travel restrictions related to voting legislation could also be contentious, as it intertwines issues of legislative intent with social and political considerations.