California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR57 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 57Introduced by Assembly Members Gallagher and KileyMarch 24, 2021 Relative to the California Emergency Services Act. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 57, as introduced, Gallagher. California Emergency Services Act.This measure would express the Legislatures support of the ruling by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urge the Governor to comply with the courts directive not to exercise legislative powers.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO Bill TextWHEREAS, Section 3 of Article III of the California Constitution provides that the powers of the state government are separate and Section 1 of Article IV of the California Constitution states that all legislative power is vested in the Legislature; andWHEREAS, Recognizing that emergencies require quick and decisive action, the Legislature passed the California Emergency Services Act in 1970 granting greater powers for the Governor to respond to emergencies; andWHEREAS, While extending greater powers to the Governor, the act does not grant the Governor all plenary power to govern in an emergency, and the Legislature has specifically reserved its lawmaking power with regard to policymaking and amending and creating state laws and policy; andWHEREAS, The recent ruling in the Sutter County Superior Court in the case of Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) clarifies this point by ruling that the California Emergency Services Act (CA Government Code [Section] 8550 et seq.) does not authorize or empower the Governor of the State of California to amend statutory law or make new statutory law, which is exclusively a legislative function not delegated to the Governor under the CESA.; andWHEREAS, The COVID-19 pandemic has been an emergency requiring the Governor to act quickly and decisively to respond to the emergency; andWHEREAS, In responding to the COVID-19 emergency, the Governor must act within the confines of the act, and specifically, the Governor may not usurp legislative powers by unilaterally amending state statutes or creating new statutory law; andWHEREAS, The Legislature guards with the utmost reverence its charge over the legislative powers granted to it by the California Constitution; andWHEREAS, The Legislature will continue to work cooperatively with the Governor in responding to this pandemic with each branch of government exercising its respective powers in protection of the public; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature hereby expresses its support of the ruling, and the interpretation of the California Emergency Services Act as expressed in that ruling, by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Super. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urges the Governor to comply with the courts clear directive not to exercise legislative powers by refraining from action which amends, alters, or changes existing statutory law or makes new statutory law or legislative policy.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 57Introduced by Assembly Members Gallagher and KileyMarch 24, 2021 Relative to the California Emergency Services Act. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 57, as introduced, Gallagher. California Emergency Services Act.This measure would express the Legislatures support of the ruling by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urge the Governor to comply with the courts directive not to exercise legislative powers.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	Assembly Concurrent Resolution
12	12
13	13	No. 57
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Assembly Members Gallagher and KileyMarch 24, 2021
16	16
17	17	Introduced by Assembly Members Gallagher and Kiley
18	18	March 24, 2021
19	19
20	20	Relative to the California Emergency Services Act.
21	21
22	22	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
25	25
26	26	ACR 57, as introduced, Gallagher. California Emergency Services Act.
27	27
28	28	This measure would express the Legislatures support of the ruling by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urge the Governor to comply with the courts directive not to exercise legislative powers.
29	29
30	30	This measure would express the Legislatures support of the ruling by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urge the Governor to comply with the courts directive not to exercise legislative powers.
31	31
32	32	## Digest Key
33	33
34	34	## Bill Text
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, Section 3 of Article III of the California Constitution provides that the powers of the state government are separate and Section 1 of Article IV of the California Constitution states that all legislative power is vested in the Legislature; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, Recognizing that emergencies require quick and decisive action, the Legislature passed the California Emergency Services Act in 1970 granting greater powers for the Governor to respond to emergencies; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, While extending greater powers to the Governor, the act does not grant the Governor all plenary power to govern in an emergency, and the Legislature has specifically reserved its lawmaking power with regard to policymaking and amending and creating state laws and policy; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, The recent ruling in the Sutter County Superior Court in the case of Gallagher v. Newsom (Sup. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) clarifies this point by ruling that the California Emergency Services Act (CA Government Code [Section] 8550 et seq.) does not authorize or empower the Governor of the State of California to amend statutory law or make new statutory law, which is exclusively a legislative function not delegated to the Governor under the CESA.; and
43	43
44	44	WHEREAS, The COVID-19 pandemic has been an emergency requiring the Governor to act quickly and decisively to respond to the emergency; and
45	45
46	46	WHEREAS, In responding to the COVID-19 emergency, the Governor must act within the confines of the act, and specifically, the Governor may not usurp legislative powers by unilaterally amending state statutes or creating new statutory law; and
47	47
48	48	WHEREAS, The Legislature guards with the utmost reverence its charge over the legislative powers granted to it by the California Constitution; and
49	49
50	50	WHEREAS, The Legislature will continue to work cooperatively with the Governor in responding to this pandemic with each branch of government exercising its respective powers in protection of the public; now, therefore, be it
51	51
52	52	Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature hereby expresses its support of the ruling, and the interpretation of the California Emergency Services Act as expressed in that ruling, by Sutter County Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman in Gallagher v. Newsom (Super. Ct. No. CVCS20-0912) and urges the Governor to comply with the courts clear directive not to exercise legislative powers by refraining from action which amends, alters, or changes existing statutory law or makes new statutory law or legislative policy.