California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1000

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Refer
6/21/22  

Caption

Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the operations of law enforcement agencies across California, specifically in how they handle and broadcast their communications. By requiring public access to radio communications, agencies must balance transparency with the necessity of protecting sensitive information, particularly concerning criminal justice databases. This change aims to foster a more informed public while upholding confidentiality standards mandated by state laws regarding the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS).

Summary

Senate Bill 1000, introduced by Senator Becker, amends the California Penal Code by adding Section 13675, which mandates that all law enforcement agencies ensure public access to their radio communications by January 1, 2024. This includes various methods, such as unencrypted frequencies, online streaming, and, upon request, access to encrypted communications for a fee. The intent of this legislation is to enhance transparency and public engagement regarding law enforcement activities and decision-making processes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 1000 is mixed, as various stakeholders express differing views. Proponents argue that increased transparency fosters trust and accountability in law enforcement operations, which is beneficial for community relations. Conversely, some law enforcement officials and concern groups worry that unrestricted public access to communications might compromise operational security, especially during sensitive situations like undercover operations or tactical responses.

Contention

Key points of contention include the feasibility of implementing such a broad mandate and the potential risks associated with public access to police communications. Critics highlight concerns regarding the release of personal information and sensitive law enforcement data, calling for a careful balancing act between public access and the protection of individual privacy rights. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to limit the broadcasting of personally identifiable or confidential information, but the effectiveness of these measures continues to be a topic of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB719

Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.

CA AB730

Elections: deceptive audio or visual media.

CA AB2245

Voter registration.

CA SB1131

Address confidentiality: public entity employees and contractors.

CA SB46

Emergency services: telecommunications.

CA AB2348

California Emergency Services Act: notification systems: Feather Alert.

CA AB602

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

CA SB794

Emergency services: telecommunications.