California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1016

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/27/22  
Chaptered
9/27/22  
Passed
9/27/22  

Caption

Special education: eligibility: fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

Impact

The implementation of SB 1016 would lead to an increase in the number of children qualifying for special education services, thereby potentially imposing additional responsibilities on local educational agencies. The California Constitution mandates state reimbursement for any costs incurred by local agencies due to state mandates. The bill contains provisions ensuring that if additional costs arise from the inclusion of FASD, local districts would be reimbursed appropriately, promoting equity in educational services across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 1016 mandates that the State Board of Education include fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) in the definition of 'other health impairment' for special education eligibility. This inclusion is significant as it broadens the scope of students who might qualify for special education services, reflecting a growing recognition of the impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on educational performance. Existing laws require the identification and assessment of all children with disabilities needing special education, thus the legislation aims to ensure that children affected by FASD receive the necessary support.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1016 appears to be generally positive, with proponents highlighting the need for inclusive educational policies that recognize and accommodate varying health impairments. By addressing FASD, supporters argue that the bill acknowledges the unique challenges faced by affected children and provides them avenues for the support they require. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation and funding of these expanded services, which could arise as points of contention in future discussions.

Contention

Some contention may emerge concerning the financial implications of expanding the special education eligibility criteria. While the guarantee of state reimbursements is intended to alleviate some of these concerns, critics might argue about the sufficiency and timeliness of such reimbursements. Additionally, discussions may focus on the adequacy of training and resources available to educators in supporting students with FASD, who may present a unique set of challenges compared to other health impairments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2199

Birthing Justice for California Families Pilot Project.

CA AB583

Birthing Justice for California Families Pilot Project.

CA SB199

The California Health Care Cost, Quality, and Equity Atlas.

CA SB823

Mental health: the CARE Act.

CA AB2960

Child care and development services: online portal.

CA SB691

Pupil attendance: truancy notifications.

CA AB2303

Health and care facilities: prospective payment system rate increase.

CA SB687

Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council.