California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1136

Introduced
2/16/22  
Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/24/22  
Engrossed
5/24/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Refer
6/21/22  
Refer
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Refer
6/27/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Vetoed
9/28/22  

Caption

California Environmental Quality Act: expedited environmental review: climate change regulations.

Impact

The changes introduced by SB 1136 impact how lead agencies prepare environmental impact reports (EIRs) and negative declarations for projects, especially those involving compliance with pollution control equipment regulations. By allowing for focused EIRs under specific conditions, the bill aims to make it easier for agencies to meet environmental objectives. However, these amendments also introduce stringent labor requirements for projects that want to utilize these focused EIRs, which may impose new responsibilities on state and local entities.

Summary

Senate Bill 1136, introduced by Senator Portantino, amends several sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to streamline the environmental review process, particularly focusing on projects related to climate change regulations. The bill mandates that specific public agencies conduct an environmental analysis when adopting rules or regulations targeting the reduction of greenhouse gases, air pollutants, or toxic contaminants. This addition emphasizes the urgency to comply with climate-related environmental standards while simplifying the bureaucratic process involved in project approvals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 1136 appears to be supportive of the need to expedite the environmental review process to better align with climate initiatives. Advocates regard the bill as a necessary step in combating climate change, while critics express concern over potential overreach and the added complexities that labor requirements might introduce. Views are mixed among stakeholders, with some emphasizing that these measures could help facilitate quicker compliance with important environmental goals.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the additional burden that labor requirements may impose on public agencies and contractors. While the bill aims to streamline processes for environmentally beneficial projects, it also raises questions about the administrative challenges that could arise from enforcing these new labor standards. There are concerns about ensuring that these obligations do not deter compliance with climate-related projects, potentially hindering the very objectives SB 1136 seeks to achieve.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB422

Unemployment compensation: motion picture industry: loan-out companies.

CA SB995

Environmental quality: Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011: housing projects.

CA AB2731

California Environmental Quality Act: City of San Diego: Old Town Center redevelopment.

CA SB7

Environmental quality: Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2021.

CA SB974

California Environmental Quality Act: small disadvantaged community water system: state small water system: exemption.

CA AB621

California Environmental Quality Act: streamlined environmental review: standard of review: hospitals.

CA SB44

California Environmental Quality Act: streamlined judicial review: environmental leadership transit projects.