California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1143

Introduced
2/16/22  
Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
5/2/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Vetoed
9/27/22  

Caption

Acute Care Psychiatric Hospital Loan Fund.

Impact

The bill directly impacts local governments and healthcare providers in their ability to expand or improve their psychiatric facilities. By offering financial support through low-interest loans, SB 1143 encourages the development of much-needed psychiatric environments for individuals in crisis or requiring extensive medical monitoring. This move responds to the alarming statistics highlighting the increasing demand for psychiatric care against a backdrop of dwindling resources, particularly poignant in regions classified as medically underserved.

Summary

Senate Bill 1143, also known as the Acute Care Psychiatric Hospital Loan Fund Act, was introduced by Senator Roth and aims to address the significant shortage of psychiatric beds in California. The bill establishes a fund that provides zero-interest loans to qualifying county or city applicants for the construction or renovation of acute care psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric health facilities. Given the strain on psychiatric bed capacity, this act is seen as a critical step towards enhancing mental health services within communities across the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 1143 appears to be favorable, particularly among mental health advocates and local government officials who recognize the urgent need to improve psychiatric care infrastructure. However, some concerns regarding funding and resource allocation may exist, as stakeholders assess how effectively these loans can be administered and whether they will translate into tangible improvements in service delivery.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential challenges related to the implementation of the loan program, such as ensuring equitable access to funds across various counties, especially those with fewer resources. There's also emphasis on prioritizing areas with the greatest need for psychiatric facilities, which may lead to debates over which areas receive funding first. Finally, with a requirement for recipients to maintain and operate their facilities for the duration of the loan, questions about the long-term viability of new projects may arise, necessitating careful oversight by the California Health Facilities Financing Authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB45

California Acute Care Psychiatric Hospital Loan Fund.

CA AB2317

Children’s psychiatric residential treatment facilities.

CA AB137

Health omnibus trailer bill.

CA SB137

Health omnibus trailer bill.

CA AB2018

Mental health workforce planning: loan forgiveness, loan repayment, and scholarship programs.

CA SB43

Behavioral health.

CA AB1971

Mental health services: involuntary detention: gravely disabled.

CA AB348

Full-service partnerships.