The enactment of SB 1373 has significant implications for state law, particularly in balancing local agency responsibilities and the need for economic recovery post-pandemic. Many local agencies faced staffing shortages during the pandemic, complicating their ability to manage surplus land disposals under the existing timeline. The extension provided by this bill is seen as critical for supporting local efforts to revitalize communities. It ensures that local bodies can focus adequately on these processes, enabling the eventual growth of affordable housing and other necessary developments, thereby bolstering local economies.
Senate Bill No. 1373, introduced by Senator Kamlager, amends Section 54234 of the Government Code regarding the disposal of surplus land by local agencies. The bill primarily extends the timeline for local agencies to complete the disposal of certain types of surplus land, specifically those located in charter cities with populations exceeding 2 million. Previously, these properties were required to be disposed of by December 31, 2022; the bill changes this deadline to December 31, 2024, easing burdens on local governments during recovery periods from the COVID-19 pandemic and allowing further opportunities for economic development projects, like the Metro North Hollywood Joint Development Project.
General sentiment around SB 1373 has been largely supportive, especially within local government circles that engage in land use and housing issues. Supporters argue that the bill's urgent nature appropriately reflects the challenges local agencies have faced recently, and that it facilitates necessary delayed projects that could lead to substantial community benefits, including job creation and affordable housing. Some critics, however, caution about potential over-reliance on extensions that may delay initiatives that are meant to prioritize affordable housing and suggest that legislative clarity is needed on future timelines and conditions.
While SB 1373 is primarily viewed as beneficial, there are points of contention regarding the balance of local control versus state oversight. The extension of dates for land disposal is seen by some as a necessary flexibility for local agencies; however, opponents argue it risks further delays in addressing the urgent housing crisis exacerbated by the pandemic. The necessity for immediate action within the provision of this bill sparks debate around the appropriate pace and governance structures in land development and public resource management.