California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1392

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Refer
6/28/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Refer
8/15/22  
Refer
8/15/22  
Refer
8/15/22  
Refer
8/15/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/13/22  
Chaptered
9/13/22  
Passed
9/13/22  

Caption

Aquaculture: registration, renewal, surcharge, and penalty fees: reports.

Impact

The changes put forth in SB 1392 will predominantly affect existing provisions for aquaculture operations within California. By extending the increased fees, the bill ensures that the Department of Fish and Wildlife can continue to fund inspections, regulatory measures, and program administration. Moreover, it mandates periodic reporting to assess whether fees and taxes adequately cover the program's costs, fostering transparency and accountability in how the fees are utilized. This bill is thus positioned to stabilize funding for aquaculture, which is vital for a growing industry.

Summary

Senate Bill 1392, introduced by Senator McGuire, proposes amendments to the Fish and Game Code regarding the registration, renewal, surcharge, and penalty fees for aquaculture facilities. This bill seeks to extend the increased fees previously enacted until January 1, 2024, thereby ensuring ongoing funding for the aquaculture program. It requires owners of aquaculture facilities to provide specified information and impose penalties for delinquent fee payments. The legislation aims to maintain a structured and well-funded aquaculture program that can adequately support the interests and regulations surrounding this sector.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill appears supportive, particularly from stakeholders in the aquaculture industry who recognize the need for a reliable and well-managed regulatory framework. However, some may express concerns regarding the financial burden imposed by the increased fees, particularly smaller aquaculture operators. The bill's proponents argue it is essential for the sustainability and growth of the industry, while critics may advocate for a more equitable fee structure that considers the variances in operational scale and revenue.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the surcharge fees imposed on aquaculture businesses with gross annual sales exceeding $25,000. Critics suggest that this could disproportionately impact smaller operators, who may struggle to keep up with the financial demands of compliance. Additionally, the potential for penalties for late fee payments introduces further concerns for aquaculture businesses, emphasizing the need for balance between regulatory requirements and the industry's economic realities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB809

Natural resources.

CA SB500

Fish and wildlife.

ME LD465

An Act to Update Waste Discharge License Fees

CA SB1093

Mariculture: master permitting program: designation of suitable state waters.

FL H1279

Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

NJ S4273

Modifies definition of "aquaculture" throughout State law to include construction of facilities and appurtenant structures.

CA SB939

Emergencies: COVID-19: commercial tenancies: evictions.

TX SB2333

Relating to the marketing of shrimp and aquaculture products.