California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1472

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
5/2/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/27/22  
Chaptered
9/27/22  
Passed
9/27/22  

Caption

Vehicular manslaughter: speeding and reckless driving.

Impact

The impact of SB 1472 is significant, as it aims to alter state laws concerning vehicular manslaughter and reckless driving. By broadening the definition of gross negligence, the bill intends to hold reckless drivers accountable for their actions more effectively. The law seeks to deter dangerous driving behaviors, ultimately enhancing public safety on California's roads. Moreover, since this bill mandates changes to the legal definitions of certain crimes, its passage signifies a shift in how local agencies may approach enforcement and prosecution of driving offenses.

Summary

Senate Bill 1472, known as Ryans Law, addresses the growing issue of reckless driving, particularly in the context of vehicular manslaughter. The bill amends the Penal Code to more clearly define circumstances that can be considered as gross negligence, which could lead to a charge of vehicular manslaughter. Such circumstances include participation in street racing or driving over 100 miles per hour. This legislative change is in response to alarming statistics indicating a rise in traffic fatalities and serious injuries associated with reckless driving behaviors, including sideshows and high-speed racing events.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1472 reflects a heightened concern for public safety amidst increasing traffic incidents in California. Advocates for the bill see it as a necessary step to combat the epidemic of reckless driving and promote road safety. However, there may be contention regarding increased policing and legal ramifications for drivers, with some critics arguing that certain provisions could lead to over-policing and unintended consequences for citizens. Nonetheless, the general sentiment appears to lean towards supporting measures that enhance safety and accountability among drivers.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve how the bill's expanded definitions may be enforced and whether they could lead to disproportionately severe consequences for certain drivers. Critics express concerns that the bill may target behaviors associated with youth culture, such as sideshow participation, without adequately addressing deeper systemic issues related to road safety and community engagement. Moreover, there are discussions about the challenges law enforcement might face when applying the new definitions in real-world scenarios.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB410

Vehicles: motor vehicle sideshows.

CA SB1078

Vehicular manslaughter.

CA AB2823

Crimes: vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

CA AB1087

Crimes: vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

CA AB1865

Guide, signal, and service dogs: injury or death.

CA AB3085

Vehicles: removal and impoundment.

CA AB169

Guide, signal, and service dogs: injury or death.

CA AB486

Vehicles: sideshows and street takeovers.