California Senate Bill SB272

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/21
• Refer: 2/10/21
• Refer: 3/10/21
• Refer: 3/18/21
• Report Pass: 4/13/21
• Refer: 4/13/21
• Report Pass: 4/21/21
• Engrossed: 4/29/21
• Refer: 5/13/21
• Report Pass: 6/9/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/22/21
• Enrolled: 7/15/21
• Chaptered: 7/23/21
• Passed: 7/23/21

Caption

State government: gender-neutral terms: California Conservation Corps.

Impact

If enacted, SB 272 would amend numerous sections of the Public Resources Code, Insurance Code, and Vehicle Code, updating language and establishing a more inclusive framework for individuals participating in state-supported conservation programs. The changes are expected to enhance not only the administrative aspects of these programs but also promote greater youth participation, thereby contributing to the development of important life skills and job readiness among young adults in California.

Summary

Senate Bill 272, introduced by Senator Laird, focuses on modernizing language and criteria within California laws, specifically relating to the California Conservation Corps. The bill aims to update legal terminology to be gender-neutral and amends age requirements for certification of nonprofit community conservation corps from 18-25 years to 18-26 years. This legislative move is proposed to reflect contemporary views on gender inclusivity and to support a broader age range for youth engagement in conservation efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 272 appears generally positive, particularly among supporters of gender equity and youth development initiatives. Proponents argue that the bill addresses outdated provisions that fail to reflect current societal norms. However, there may be some contention from traditionalists who may perceive the changes as unnecessary or overly progressive, highlighting a societal debate on gender language and inclusivity in legislation.

Contention

While there does not seem to be significant opposition articulated against SB 272, the bill's implications on existing structures could invite scrutiny, particularly regarding the potential impacts on funding and program delivery within the California Conservation Corps. The flexibility in youth age eligibility might raise questions about the effectiveness of conservation efforts aimed at motivated younger adults aged 25-26 and whether it could dilute opportunities for younger participants aged 18-25.