California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB299

Introduced
2/3/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Refer
3/25/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Report Pass
7/1/21  
Refer
7/5/21  
Refer
7/5/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  

Caption

Victim compensation: use of force by a law enforcement officer.

Impact

The amendments in SB 299 will likely lead to a higher number of compensation claims related to law enforcement activities. By redefining eligibility criteria for compensation, the bill aims to create opportunities for victims of police violence to receive support from the California Victim Compensation Board, which could also put pressure on law enforcement agencies to reconsider their use of force policies. Additionally, the bill stipulates that previous legal determinations regarding a victim's involvement in a crime cannot be used against them when seeking compensation, thus providing a degree of protection for vulnerable claimants.

Summary

SB 299, introduced by Senator Leyva, amends California's victim compensation laws to expand the definition of 'crime' to include incidents resulting from the use of force by law enforcement officers where severe injury or death occurs. This change is significant as it allows victims and their families to seek compensation regardless of whether the officer faced arrest or charges. The bill aims to address the needs of victims affected by law enforcement actions, reflecting current societal concerns over police use of force and ensuring that victims have access to support and resources.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards SB 299 appears to be supportive amongst advocates for victim rights and reformers seeking greater accountability for law enforcement actions. However, there may be concerns from law enforcement professionals who could see the bill as potentially undermining their authority and complicating criminal investigations. The ongoing national dialogue regarding policing practices and systemic racism plays a pivotal role in shaping public opinion on this legislation.

Contention

A primary point of contention surrounding SB 299 is whether it may lead to fraudulent claims or abuse of the compensation system, as critics argue that expanding the definition of 'crime' could create loopholes. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the stigmatization of law enforcement officers, as the bill restricts their ability to utilize victim compensation determinations in disciplinary hearings. This might raise questions about accountability and transparency in law enforcement practices, warranting further examination as the bill proceeds through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB838

Victim compensation: use of force by a law enforcement officer.

CA AB767

Victim compensation: use of excessive force by a peace officer.

CA AB1449

California Victim Compensation Board: victim restitution: eligibility for compensation.

CA AB2649

Victim compensation: funeral and burial costs.

CA AB1639

Crime victims: the California Victim Compensation Board.

CA AB329

Victim compensation: use of excessive force by law enforcement.

CA AB1100

Victim compensation.

CA AB2100

California Victim Compensation Board: victim restitution: violence peer counseling.