California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB301

Introduced
2/3/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
3/10/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
1/3/22  
Refer
1/3/22  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Refer
1/13/22  
Refer
1/13/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  
Report Pass
1/20/22  
Engrossed
1/24/22  
Engrossed
1/24/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Report Pass
6/21/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/24/22  
Chaptered
9/30/22  
Chaptered
9/30/22  
Passed
9/30/22  

Caption

Marketplaces: online marketplaces.

Impact

The implementation of SB301 is expected to enhance consumer protection by ensuring that buyers can better identify and contact sellers of products purchased online. The bill attempts to establish accountability for online transactions, particularly to safeguard customers from potential fraud or misinformation. By requiring reputable information and compliance from sellers, it aims to create a more trustworthy marketplace environment for buyers while mitigating risks related to e-commerce fraud.

Summary

Senate Bill 301 (SB301) aims to regulate online marketplaces in California by imposing requirements on high-volume third-party sellers operating through these platforms. Commencing July 1, 2023, the bill mandates that high-volume third-party sellers—defined as those engaging in 200 or more transactions and generating at least $5,000 in revenue over a 12-month period—must provide specific identifying information, including bank account details or payee names, physical addresses, and contact information within ten days of qualifying as such. Online marketplaces are also required to verify this information promptly and maintain clear communication with consumers regarding seller identities.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB301 appears to be supportive of consumer protection efforts, with acknowledgments of the need to adapt to the increasing prominence of online shopping. However, there are arguments about the potential burden it places on smaller sellers who may find compliance difficult and costly. Advocates for the bill emphasize the heightened need for accountability and clarity in online shopping, whereas critics argue it may stifle small businesses and reduce competition due to increased regulatory compliance costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the obligation placed on sellers to disclose extensive personal and financial information, which some fear could infringe on privacy rights. While proponents argue that such transparency is essential for consumer safety, opponents caution that excessive requirements might dissuade new sellers from entering the market or may lead to a reliance on larger businesses that can handle compliance demands. The fines for non-compliance, up to $10,000 per violation, have also garnered attention, highlighting the tension between regulatory enforcement and small business sustainability in the e-commerce landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A3543

Imposes certain requirements on online marketplaces.

NJ S2579

Imposes certain requirements on online marketplaces.

CA SB1144

Marketplaces: online marketplaces.

NH SB355

Requiring online marketplaces to disclose certain information to consumers.

MO SB250

Creates provisions relating to organized retail theft

WV HB2908

Relating to disclosure of information by online marketplaces to inform consumers

CO HB1099

Online Marketplaces And Third-party Sellers

CT SB00257

An Act Concerning High Volume Third-party Sellers On Online Marketplaces.