California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB302

Introduced
2/3/21  
Introduced
2/3/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Report Pass
3/9/21  
Refer
3/9/21  
Refer
3/9/21  
Engrossed
3/25/21  
Engrossed
3/25/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/9/21  
Enrolled
9/9/21  
Chaptered
9/24/21  
Chaptered
9/24/21  
Passed
9/24/21  

Caption

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

Impact

The passage of SB 302 enables the Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians to pursue gaming operations and thus bolster their economic independence and stability. By ratifying the compact, the legislation acknowledges tribal sovereignty and facilitates a legal framework for the tribe to engage in gaming activities that are vital for their self-sufficiency. Additionally, by setting forth that specific actions will not be considered projects under CEQA, it streamlines regulatory processes that could impede the tribe's ability to execute agreements related to the gaming operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 302, authored by Dodd, focuses on the ratification of a tribal-state gaming compact between the State of California and the Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians. This compact, executed on August 10, 2021, is crucial for authorizing certain gaming activities on tribal lands under federal law. The bill not only ratifies this compact but also exempts selected actions from being classified as projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which generally necessitates extensive environmental review.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 302 appears to be generally positive, particularly from supporters of tribal sovereignty and economic development initiatives. Advocates emphasize the importance of giving tribes the tools they need to thrive economically and maintain their cultural identity. However, some concerns may arise regarding the broader implications of exempting actions related to tribal gaming from CEQA, which could trigger discussions on environmental impacts and oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the balance between tribal sovereignty and state regulatory frameworks. Detractors may argue that the exemption from CEQA could lead to insufficient environmental oversight of gaming operations. Supporters, however, contend that this is a necessary measure to respect the autonomy of the tribe and promote economic empowerment. The urgency clause embedded in the bill reflects the critical nature of this legislation for the tribe's immediate economic needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB931

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA AB1658

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA SB898

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA SB1145

Gambling Control Act.

CA SB736

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB559

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB49

Tribal gaming: compact and amendment ratification.

CA SB771

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.