California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB343

Introduced
2/9/21  
Introduced
2/9/21  
Refer
2/17/21  
Refer
2/17/21  
Report Pass
3/16/21  
Report Pass
3/16/21  
Refer
3/17/21  
Refer
3/17/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Refer
4/8/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/1/21  
Engrossed
6/1/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Refer
6/14/21  
Refer
6/14/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Refer
6/28/21  
Refer
6/28/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Refer
7/8/21  
Report Pass
8/30/21  
Report Pass
8/30/21  
Enrolled
9/9/21  
Chaptered
10/5/21  
Chaptered
10/5/21  
Passed
10/5/21  

Caption

Environmental advertising: recycling symbol: recyclability: products and packaging.

Impact

If enacted, the bill necessitates the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to update its regulations and require operators of disposal facilities to disclose how collected materials are processed. The law stipulates that a product or packaging will only be considered recyclable if it meets specific criteria and is accepted by recycling programs that cover a sizable portion of California’s population. This development intends to create a clearer standard for consumers and facilitate better recycling practices across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 343, introduced by Allen, addresses environmental advertising, specifically regarding the recyclability of products and packaging in California. The bill emphasizes the need for truthfulness in environmental marketing claims and mandates that consumers receive accurate information about how to properly manage the end-of-life of products. It is a response to the growing concern over misleading recyclability claims, particularly within the context of plastic products. By enshrining this policy into law, SB343 aims to give consumers reliable data and protect them from being misled about the true recyclability of products they purchase.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward SB343 is largely supportive among environmental advocates and legislators who argue it is a necessary step to enhance consumer awareness and combat greenwashing in environmental marketing. However, some industry representatives are concerned about the implications of stricter regulations on packaging and product labeling, fearing it may impose additional costs on businesses. The polarized sentiments reflect a broader debate surrounding environmental responsibility and commercial feasibility.

Contention

A primary contention surrounding the bill is its enforcement and the responsibility it places on companies to substantiate recyclability claims. While proponents argue this is essential for consumer protection, critics question the practicality of gathering data and maintaining compliance, especially in an industry already challenged by fluctuating recycling markets. Additionally, the bill expands existing criminal penalties for deceptive marketing, raising concerns about increased scrutiny and potential liabilities for businesses that inadvertently misrepresent their products.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1461

State of emergency and local emergency: landslide.

CA AB473

Environmental advertising: recyclability.

CA SB1231

Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act: environmental advertising.

CA SB1143

Paint products: stewardship program.

CA AB1526

Public resources.

CA SB54

Solid waste: reporting, packaging, and plastic food service ware.