California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB37

Introduced
12/7/20  
Introduced
12/7/20  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
2/10/21  
Refer
3/1/21  
Refer
3/1/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/1/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Report Pass
6/16/21  
Refer
6/16/21  
Refer
6/16/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Refer
7/7/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  

Caption

Contaminated Site Cleanup and Safety Act.

Impact

The bill seeks to amend existing laws under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to enable projects located on contaminated sites to potentially bypass certain environmental reviews, provided they meet specific conditions. This provision is intended to expedite development projects while ensuring that soil and groundwater contamination issues are adequately addressed. However, this approach raises concerns about the adequacy of environmental protections when development projects are exempt from extensive CEQA scrutiny.

Summary

Senate Bill 37, known as the Contaminated Site Cleanup and Safety Act, is designed to enhance public safety and environmental integrity by modifying how contaminated sites are managed and reported in California. The bill mandates that various state agencies compile lists related to hazardous waste and contaminated sites, but it streamlines the process by allowing agencies to post this information on their websites rather than distributing it to local governments or the public directly. This change is primarily aimed at improving accessibility and efficiency in accessing information related to hazardous sites.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 37 appears to be mixed, with supporters praising the bill as a necessary reform to facilitate housing and other developments in areas with historical contamination issues. Advocates argue that it will jumpstart economic activity and improve housing availability. Conversely, opponents worry that the bill undermines environmental regulations and could lead to public health risks by reducing oversight on potentially hazardous sites.

Contention

Key points of contention stem from the balancing act between fostering development and ensuring public safety. Critics argue that exemptions provided under the bill could lead to increased risk of exposure to environmental hazards for residents, particularly in communities already facing challenges related to contamination. They emphasize the importance of maintaining robust oversight mechanisms within CEQA to protect environmental health, especially in sensitive areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB168

Planning and zoning: annual report: housing development: streamlined approvals.

CA AB2746

Streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments: agricultural employee housing.

CA AB2668

Planning and zoning.

CA SB423

Land use: streamlined housing approvals: multifamily housing developments.

CA AB2561

Planning and zoning: housing: streamlined, ministerial approval: Benicia Arsenal Historic District.

CA AB831

Planning and zoning: housing: development application modifications.

CA AB1174

Planning and zoning: housing: development application modifications, approvals, and subsequent permits.