Residential solar energy systems: permitting.
The bill will significantly influence state laws governing land use and energy relevant to residential solar installations. It sets a compliance schedule that necessitates cities with populations over 50,000 to have the automated systems in place by September 30, 2023, while smaller jurisdictions will have until September 30, 2024. Notably, the legislation specifies that local agencies must self-certify their compliance when applying for specific energy funds, thus holding them accountable for implementation. Cities and counties are encouraged to utilize SolarAPP+, a tool designed to ease permitting complexities, which contributes to overall efficiency.
Senate Bill No. 379, introduced by Senator Wiener, focuses on residential solar energy systems and aims to enhance the permitting process for their installation. The bill mandates that every city and county in California implement an online, automated permitting platform, facilitating real-time verification of code compliance and permit issuance for residential solar energy systems and energy storage systems. This change is expected to streamline the current bureaucratic procedures that affect the timely adoption of solar technologies, ultimately supporting California's ambitious clean energy goals.
The sentiment surrounding SB 379 generally leans positive among proponents who view it as a crucial step towards meeting California’s renewable energy adoption goals and reducing the costs associated with permitting. Supporters argue that less bureaucratic red tape will result in more homeowners being able to install solar systems without significant delays or unjust fees. Conversely, there are concerns among local government advocates regarding the state's imposition of mandates on local permits, which some view as potentially diluting local control over building and energy regulations.
A critical point of contention lies in balancing state mandates with local governance. While supporters emphasize that streamlined processes can help achieve statewide energy objectives, opponents contend that such a framework might overlook local needs and specific conditions relating to solar energy development. Furthermore, concerns about whether smaller jurisdictions, exempt from certain provisions, might face challenges adhering to these requirements are prominent, suggesting a need for more tailored support to ensure compliance across California's diverse regions.