California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB39

Introduced
12/7/20  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Refer
4/15/21  
Refer
4/15/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/28/21  
Engrossed
5/28/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Report Pass
6/17/21  
Report Pass
6/17/21  
Refer
6/21/21  
Refer
6/21/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Refer
6/24/21  

Caption

Fraudulent claims: inmates.

Impact

The legislation significantly modifies the existing protocols surrounding unemployment compensation in California. By enabling the Employment Development Department to verify a claimant's incarcerated status before payment is made, it closes loopholes that previously allowed inmates to falsely claim unemployment benefits. This action is seen as a necessary step to preserve the integrity of the unemployment insurance program and to protect those legitimately in need of assistance.

Summary

Senate Bill 39, introduced by Senator Grove, aims to address issues of fraudulent claims for unemployment compensation benefits by requiring the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide the Employment Development Department with the names and social security numbers of current inmates. This information will assist in preventing payments made to individuals incarcerated in state prisons who are not eligible for such benefits. The bill emphasizes the need for timely verification, mandating that the information be updated every 90 days and only used when it is current and relevant.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiments surrounding SB 39 appear to be largely supportive, particularly among those advocating for responsible fiscal management and the elimination of fraud within state programs. Supporters argue that the bill will help ensure that benefits are distributed fairly and effectively, while concerns may linger regarding privacy implications and the adequacy of measures taken to protect sensitive information.

Contention

Notable contentions arose regarding the potential risks associated with sharing sensitive social security data. Critics may express red flags about protecting inmates' rights to privacy and the accuracy of records being shared to prevent fraudulent claims. Nonetheless, proponents assert that the urgency of preventing fraud justifies the necessity of the measures outlined in the bill, ultimately prioritizing the effective management of state resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB110

Fraudulent claims for unemployment compensation benefits: inmates.

CA AB56

Benefits: outgoing mail: claim processing: reporting.

CA SB420

Unemployment insurance: Unemployment Insurance Integrity Enforcement Act.

CA SB644

Health care coverage outreach.

CA SB595

Covered California: data sharing.

CA SB83

Employment.