California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB435

Introduced
2/16/21  
Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
1/3/22  
Refer
1/3/22  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Report Pass
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Civil law: personal rights: online sex trafficking: sexual photographs.

Impact

The enactment of SB 435 would significantly alter civil law in California by providing robust protections for individuals against unauthorized distribution of sexually explicit images. It heightens the financial penalties for violations, offering statutory damages of up to $100,000 per violation and $200,000 if the depicted individual is under 18. Additionally, it empowers victims to seek injunctive relief to prevent further distribution of these materials, thereby enhancing individual privacy rights in the digital age.

Summary

Senate Bill 435, introduced by Senator Cortese, aims to combat online sex trafficking through enhanced civil regulations surrounding the distribution of sexually explicit photographs and materials. The bill allows individuals who are depicted in such materials to pursue civil actions against those who create or distribute these images without consent. This builds upon existing protections while broadening the scope to include a clearer definition of 'actionable material' and the consequences of non-compliance for digital distributors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 435 is generally positive among supporters who view it as a necessary step toward protecting vulnerable populations, particularly minors and victims of human trafficking. However, there are concerns regarding the implications for online platforms and service providers. Opponents might worry about the potential legal burden placed on them and issues of freedom of expression. The discussions reflect a tension between enhancing individual rights and managing the operational realities of digital distribution.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions about SB 435 include the potential impact on digital platforms that might be held liable for user-generated content. Critics argue that the bill could impose stringent requirements on these platforms to monitor and control content in ways that are impractical. Meanwhile, supporters assert that the bill is essential for fostering accountability in the online landscape, especially regarding sensitive materials involving minors or non-consenting adults.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB646

Civil law: personal rights: online sex trafficking: sexual photographs.

CA AB602

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

CA SB1210

Personal rights: obscene materials: attorney’s fees.

CA SB564

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

CA AB1979

Doxing Victims Recourse Act.

CA SB798

Unsolicited lewd images.

CA AB514

Injunctions: undertakings: civil actions: distribution of sexually explicit materials.

CA AB3140

Access to reproductive health services.