California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB564

Introduced
2/18/21  
Introduced
2/18/21  
Refer
3/3/21  
Refer
3/3/21  
Report Pass
3/22/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Refer
3/23/21  
Engrossed
4/22/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Report Pass
6/8/21  
Report Pass
6/8/21  
Refer
6/8/21  
Refer
6/8/21  
Report Pass
6/30/21  
Report Pass
6/30/21  
Enrolled
7/8/21  
Enrolled
7/8/21  
Enrolled
9/8/21  
Chaptered
9/28/21  
Passed
9/28/21  

Caption

Hospitals: seismic compliance: O’Connor Hospital and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.

Impact

The bill permits the relevant department to grant a waiver of seismic regulations, potentially easing operational constraints for OConnor Hospital and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center. Under the provisions of this legislation, these hospitals must outline a compliance schedule and their progress towards it. For instance, compliance for specific upgrades must be achieved by either July 1, 2023, or December 31, 2024. This adjustment reflects a legislative intent to adapt public health infrastructure requirements in the face of emerging needs and stresses, particularly during emergencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 564, introduced by Senator Cortese, amends existing guidelines under the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983 concerning seismic compliance for OConnor Hospital and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center located in San Jose, California. The bill provides a mechanism for the Department of Health Care Access and Information to waive certain seismic safety compliance requirements imposed on these hospitals if they submit a feasible compliance plan by a specified deadline. This enables the hospitals to manage their compliance efforts while promoting public safety, particularly in light of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment regarding SB 564 appears to be positive from a public health perspective, with recognition of the necessity to ensure that vulnerable populations have access to healthcare during trying times. However, some concerns might exist regarding the waiver provisions, with the potential implications for seismic safety being of particular interest to certain stakeholders, including patient advocacy groups and community members who emphasize the importance of maintaining stringent safety standards in hospital facilities.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB 564 revolves around balancing the urgent need for effective healthcare delivery against the stringent safety protocols established in seismic compliance laws. While the bill aims to facilitate immediate public health responses, critics may argue that waiving certain safety standards could compromise the structural integrity of hospital facilities in the long term, especially given California's vulnerability to seismic events. Concerns about adequately preparing the hospitals for such emergencies while ensuring ongoing patient care are pivotal to discussions around the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2904

Alameda Hospital: seismic safety compliance deadline: extension.

CA AB1471

Hospitals: seismic compliance: O’Connor Hospital and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.

CA SB1119

Hospitals: seismic compliance.

CA SB1447

Hospitals: seismic compliance: Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

CA SB332

Wastewater treatment: recycled water.

CA AB869

Hospitals: seismic safety compliance.

CA AB1231

Criminal procedure: Safer Communities Through Opportunities Act.

CA AB1358

Renewable energy generation: transmission planning: report.