California Senate Bill SB708

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/3/21
• Refer: 3/10/21
• Refer: 3/18/21
• Refer: 4/19/21
• Report Pass: 4/27/21
• Engrossed: 5/3/21
• Refer: 5/13/21
• Report Pass: 6/17/21
• Enrolled: 6/24/21
• Chaptered: 7/9/21
• Passed: 7/9/21

Caption

Water shortage emergencies: declarations: deenergization events.

Impact

With this amendment, if there is a deenergization event — defined as a planned power outage done by an electrical corporation to curtail wildfire risks — the governing body of the public water supplier can act swiftly to impose necessary measures to conserve water without waiting for public hearings. This is particularly important in scenarios where time-sensitive decisions are crucial to safeguarding water supplies. The bill aims to enhance flexibility and responsiveness of public water suppliers in emergencies leading to potential water shortages.

Summary

Senate Bill 708, introduced by Senator Melendez, amends Section 351 of the California Water Code concerning water shortage emergencies. The bill specifically allows public water suppliers to declare a water shortage emergency without the requirement of holding a public hearing if the declaration is due to a 'deenergization event'. This change seeks to streamline the process of responding to situations where planned power outages are undertaken to mitigate the risk of wildfires, thus ensuring the availability of water during such emergencies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding SB 708 appears largely supportive among legislators focused on emergency management and public safety. Proponents emphasize the importance of responding quickly in critical situations affecting water supply and wildfire prevention. However, there are concerns regarding the removal of public hearings, with some opponents worried about diminishing participatory governance and oversight in important local decisions related to water management.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the balance between emergency preparedness and the preservation of public input in governance. Critics argue that bypassing public hearings eliminates transparency, potentially leading to arbitrary decision-making by the governing bodies. On the other hand, supporters assert that in dire situations, such as those prompted by fire-related power outages, immediate action is necessary for the greater good of the public, especially when it comes to water conservation and safety.