California Senate Bill SB776

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/3/21
• Refer: 3/10/21
• Refer: 3/18/21
• Report Pass: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/19/21
• Report Pass: 4/28/21
• Refer: 4/29/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 6/1/21
• Refer: 6/10/21
• Report Pass: 6/30/21
• Refer: 6/30/21
• Report Pass: 7/13/21
• Refer: 7/14/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/3/21
• Chaptered: 9/16/21
• Passed: 9/16/21

Caption

Safe drinking water and water quality.

Impact

The passage of SB 776 is expected to have significant implications on state laws regarding water regulation. By including small state water systems under the same oversight as larger systems, the bill seeks to address potential disparities in water quality provided to residents. Moreover, it enables the state board to consolidate enforcement authority related to financial assistance programs, making it easier to manage compliance and address violations efficiently. This regulatory enhancement is crucial for maintaining high drinking water standards across all service levels.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 776, known as the Safe Drinking Water and Water Quality Act, aims to broaden the regulatory scope of the California Safe Drinking Water Act to include small state water systems. Specifically, it mandates that these smaller systems adhere to similar operational and regulatory standards that govern larger public water systems. This change is designed to enhance the safety and quality of drinking water supplied to communities, thus reinforcing public health protections.

Sentiment

Sentiment around this bill has generally been supportive, particularly from public health advocates and environmental groups who believe that its measures are essential for guaranteeing safe drinking water access for all Californians. However, some operators of small water systems have expressed concerns regarding the feasibility of complying with stricter regulations and the associated costs. They fear that the financial implications of adhering to these regulations could negatively affect their operations and maintenance responses.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 776 include the potential economic burden it may impose on small water systems, along with concerns over the adequacy of financial resources provided through the Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund. While the bill aims to streamline the funding process for emergency water quality projects, critics argue that the requirement for emergency funds to be dispensed without written agreements may lead to mismanagement. Additionally, the bill establishes civil penalties for non-compliance, raising concerns about the equitable enforcement among various types of water systems.