California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB868

Introduced
1/24/22  
Refer
2/2/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/5/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Chaptered
9/29/22  
Passed
9/29/22  

Caption

State teachers’ retirement: supplemental benefits.

Impact

The legislation modifies existing frameworks governing the STRS by ensuring that retired members, their spouses, disabled members, and beneficiaries receive additional financial support through regular supplemental payments. The bill includes annual increases starting July 1, 2024, which signal an effort to continually enhance the financial well-being of retirees. However, these increases are contingent upon the availability of funds in the Supplemental Benefit Maintenance Account, highlighting a crucial economic consideration for sustainability.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 868, introduced by Cortese, seeks to amend various sections of the Education Code relating to the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) by providing additional supplemental benefits to retired members and their beneficiaries. The bill establishes provisions for quarterly supplemental payments from the Supplemental Benefit Maintenance Account, aimed at restoring the purchasing power of retirement allowances for eligible individuals. Starting on July 1, 2023, the bill sets forth specific percentage increases for these payments based on the period during which retirement, disability, or death occurred.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 868 appears to be generally supportive among stakeholders invested in teachers' retirement benefits. Proponents appreciate the measures aimed at enhancing the financial security of retired teachers, arguing for strengthening their purchasing power in light of inflation and increased living costs. However, there may be concerns regarding the fiscal responsibility and sustainability of committing to additional benefits, particularly in volatile economic climates.

Contention

Debate around SB 868 may revolve around the fiscal implications of increasing benefits from a continuously appropriated fund. Critics could raise questions about the long-term viability of the Supplemental Benefit Maintenance Account, particularly given the variability in state funding and economic conditions. Additionally, as the benefits are only payable to the extent that funds are available, there may be apprehension regarding the reliability and adequacy of these payments in future years.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB644

State teachers’ retirement: compensation.

CA AB2770

Public employees’ retirement.

CA AB2413

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: study: securitization.

CA AB1325

State teachers’ retirement.

AZ SB1083

ASRS; modifications

CA AB2101

Public employees’ retirement.

CA SB114

Education finance.