Carbon sequestration: Carbon Capture, Removal, Utilization, and Storage Program.
SB 905 aims to streamline the permitting process for CCUS projects by requiring the establishment of a unified permit application by January 1, 2025. This should expedite approvals necessary for construction and operation, thereby potentially accelerating the deployment of carbon mitigation technologies. The bill includes provisions for the creation of a centralized public database to monitor the progress and deployment of these technologies, reinforcing oversight while assisting stakeholders in compliance and tracking efforts.
Senate Bill 905, introduced by Senator Caballero, establishes a comprehensive framework for Carbon Capture, Removal, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) projects in California. The bill mandates the State Air Resources Board to develop a CCUS program that focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of various technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The overarching goal of the bill aligns with California's commitment to reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, as stipulated by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
The sentiment around SB 905 appears largely positive among proponents who view it as a crucial step towards achieving California’s climate goals. Advocates argue that it facilitates innovative solutions to combat climate change while ensuring the necessary regulatory frameworks are in place to protect public health and safety. However, concerns have been expressed regarding the potential risks associated with carbon sequestration, particularly regarding the environmental impact and safety of transportation pipelines, which has sparked discussions among stakeholders on regulatory rigor.
Notable points of contention exist primarily around the regulatory aspects of the bill, particularly concerning risks related to carbon dioxide leakage and seismic activity. There's concern regarding the long-term efficacy of monitoring systems for CCUS operations, the financial responsibility of project operators, and how to mitigate potential local environmental impacts. The bill requires that operators develop mitigation plans and provide proof of binding agreements preventing any drilling or extraction that could jeopardize the integrity of geologic storage, yet the silos of responsibility between local, state, and federal regulations remain a topic of debate.