COVID-19 relief: tenancy: federal rental assistance.
The bill specifically aims to prevent landlords from using a tenant's unpaid COVID-19 rental debt against them in tenant screening processes, thereby eliminating potential barriers to securing housing for individuals financially affected by the pandemic. Furthermore, it prohibits the sale or assignment of unpaid COVID-19 rental debts, which can significantly alleviate financial burdens on tenants who might be struggling but are eligible for rental assistance. The law also prohibits landlords from charging late fees related to unpaid COVID-19 debts and allows courts to consider financial hardship in any legal proceedings against tenants.
Senate Bill No. 91, enacted on January 29, 2021, is a legislative measure aimed at providing COVID-19 relief specific to tenancy and federal rental assistance. The bill amends several provisions within the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure, primarily focusing on protecting tenants experiencing financial difficulties due to the pandemic. One of the bill's primary features is its extension of additional damages for tenants whose utility services have been interrupted, imposed until July 1, 2021, as a way to mitigate the impact of non-payment due to COVID-19-related financial distress.
The sentiment surrounding SB 91 has largely been supportive, especially among tenant rights advocacy groups who regard the bill as essential in protecting vulnerable populations from eviction and undue landlord pressures. However, there is contention coming from some landlord groups who argue that such measures could reduce their financial security and stability in rental income. Overall, the sentiment reflects a strong inclination towards ensuring housing stability amid ongoing economic challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Despite its strengths, SB 91 has faced criticism primarily focused on its impact on landlords and property owners. Critics argue that while the bill offers necessary protections to tenants, it could lead to financial strain on landlords and reduced incentives to maintain rental properties. The tension lies in balancing tenant protections and landlord rights, with ongoing debates about the potential for unintended consequences affecting the rental housing market and the necessity for comprehensive support mechanisms for both parties.