California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB970 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly August 23, 2022 Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Senate Bill No. 970Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)(Coauthor: Assembly Member Haney)February 10, 2022An act to add Section 5846.5 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSB 970, as amended, Eggman. Mental Health Services Act.Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and plan updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
1+Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Senate Bill No. 970Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)February 10, 2022An act to add Section 5846.5 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSB 970, as amended, Eggman. Mental Health Services Act.Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly August 23, 2022 Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Senate Bill No. 970Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)(Coauthor: Assembly Member Haney)February 10, 2022An act to add Section 5846.5 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSB 970, as amended, Eggman. Mental Health Services Act.Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and plan updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
3+ Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Senate Bill No. 970Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)February 10, 2022An act to add Section 5846.5 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSB 970, as amended, Eggman. Mental Health Services Act.Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
44
5- Amended IN Assembly August 23, 2022 Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022
5+ Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022
66
7-Amended IN Assembly August 23, 2022
87 Amended IN Assembly June 23, 2022
98 Amended IN Senate May 02, 2022
109 Amended IN Senate April 18, 2022
1110 Amended IN Senate March 10, 2022
1211
1312 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION
1413
1514 Senate Bill
1615
1716 No. 970
1817
19-Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)(Coauthor: Assembly Member Haney)February 10, 2022
18+Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)February 10, 2022
2019
21-Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)(Coauthor: Assembly Member Haney)
20+Introduced by Senator Eggman(Principal coauthor: Senator Stern)(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Carrillo, Friedman, and Quirk-Silva)(Coauthor: Senator Glazer)
2221 February 10, 2022
2322
2423 An act to add Section 5846.5 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to mental health.
2524
2625 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2726
2827 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2928
3029 SB 970, as amended, Eggman. Mental Health Services Act.
3130
32-Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and plan updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
31+Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
3332
3433 Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 at the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund (MHSF), a continuously appropriated fund, to fund various county mental health programs, including childrens mental health care, adult and older adult mental health care, prevention and early intervention programs, and innovative programs.
3534
36-This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and plan updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
35+This bill would require the California Health and Human Services Agency, by July 1, 2025, to establish the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR), consisting of performance indicators, county self-assessments, and county MHSA improvement plans, to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The bill would require the agency to convene a workgroup, as specified, to establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services and uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans. The bill would require the agency to establish specific process measures and uniform elements for the county MHSA improvement plans and updates. The bill would require the counties to execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources. The bill would require the agency to report to the Legislature, on an annual basis, a report that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans. By imposing new requirements on counties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
3736
3837 This bill would require the agency to request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide specified services, including preparing an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the MHSF on life outcomes. The bill would require the analysis to be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup on or before July 1, 2024.
3938
4039 The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
4140
4241 This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
4342
4443 ## Digest Key
4544
4645 ## Bill Text
4746
48-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
47+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
4948
5049 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
5150
5251 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
5352
54-SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
53+SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
5554
5655 SECTION 1. Section 5846.5 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:
5756
5857 ### SECTION 1.
5958
60-5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
59+5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
6160
62-5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
61+5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
6362
64-5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.(C)Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D)(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
63+5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.(B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.(1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.(i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.(ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.(ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.(ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.(3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.(C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.(e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.(f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.(g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:(1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.(B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.(3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
6564
6665
6766
6867 5846.5. (a) This section shall be known, and may be cited as, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Outcomes and Accountability Review Act of 2022.
6968
70-(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.
69+(b) The California Health and Human Services Agency shall establish, by July 1, 2025, the California MHSA Outcomes and Accountability Review (MHSA-OAR) to facilitate a local accountability system that fosters continuous quality improvement in county programs funded by the MHSA and in the collection and dissemination by the agency of best practices in service delivery. The MHSA-OAR shall cover MHSA-funded services provided to current and former recipients and shall include the programmatic elements that each county offers as part of its MHSA service array, as well as any local program components, and shall consist of performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment process, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.
7170
72-(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews reviews, conducted by peer counties, of counties MHSA services. services as part of the county MHSA system improvement plans.
71+(c) (1) (A) On or before October 1, 2023, the agency shall convene a workgroup comprised of representatives from the State Department of Health Care Services, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, county behavioral health agencies, legislative staff, interested behavioral health advocacy and research organizations, current and former MHSA service recipients, organizations that represent county behavioral health agencies and county boards of supervisors, nonprofit community-based organizations, researchers, people with lived experience, county behavioral health agency partners, and any other entities or individuals that the agency deems necessary. The workgroup shall establish a workplan by which the MHSA-OAR shall be conducted, including a process for qualitative peer reviews of counties MHSA services.
7372
7473 (B) The agency shall report annually to the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review and the Subcommittee on Health and Human Services of the Assembly Committee on Budget during the budget process with an update on the schedule for development of, and future changes to, the MHSA-OAR.
7574
76-(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome performance indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.
75+(2) At a minimum, in establishing the work plan, the workgroup shall consider existing MHSA performance indicators being measured, additional, alternative, or additional and alternative process and outcome indicators to be measured, development of uniform elements of the county MHSA self-assessment and the county MHSA system improvement plans, timelines for implementation, recommendations for reducing the existing MHSA services data reporting burden, recommendations for financial incentives to counties for achievement on performance measures, and an analysis of the county and state workload associated with implementation of the requirements of this section.
7776
78-(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).
77+(3) The workgroup shall develop the uniform elements for the county MHSA system improvement plans required in paragraph (3) of subdivision (d). The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop the uniform elements of the updates to those plans, as required pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (d).
7978
80-(4) On or after July 1, 2025, the workgroup may be disbanded or incorporated into existing advisory bodies, at the discretion of the agency.
81-
82-(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, including specific processes and outcome measures, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.
79+(d) The MHSA-OAR shall consist of the following three components: performance indicators, a county MHSA self-assessment, and a county MHSA system improvement plan.
8380
8481 (1) (A) The MHSA-OAR performance indicators shall be consistent with programmatic goals for the MHSA, and shall include both process and outcome measures. These measures shall be established in order to provide baseline and ongoing information about how the state and counties are performing over time and to inform and guide each county behavioral health agencys MHSA self-assessment and MHSA system improvement plan.
8582
8683 (i) Process measures shall include measures of participant engagement, MHSA service delivery, and participation. Specific process measures shall be established by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, and may include measures of engagement as shown by improvement in program participation, timeliness of service provision, rates of utilization of program components, and referrals and utilization of services.
8784
8885 (ii) Outcome measures shall be determined based on the recommendations included in the analysis prepared by the University of California pursuant to subdivision (g), if the University of California enters into the contract described in subdivision (g).
8986
90-(B) Performance To the extent permitted by existing state and federal privacy laws, performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.
87+(B) Performance indicator data available in existing county data systems shall be collected by counties and provided to the agency, and performance indicator data available in existing state agency data systems shall be collected by the agency and provided to the counties. These data shall be reported in a manner, and on a schedule, determined by the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, but no less frequently than semiannually.
9188
92-(C) (i) During the first five-year three-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. performance indicators. The data reported in the first year of the first MHSA-OAR cycle shall serve as the county and statewide baselines. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures performance indicators established by the workgroup.
89+(C) (i) During the first five-year MHSA-OAR cycle, performance indicator data reported by each county, shall be used to establish both county and statewide baselines for each of the process measures. After the first review cycle, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall establish standard target thresholds for each of the process measures established by the workgroup.
9390
9491 (ii) The agency, in consultation with the workgroup, shall develop a process for resolving any disputes regarding the establishment of standard process thresholds pursuant to clause (i).
9592
96-(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to agency shall consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.
93+(D) For subsequent reviews, and based upon availability of additional data through interagency data-sharing agreements, the workgroup shall convene, as necessary, to consider whether to establish additional performance indicators that support the programmatic goals for the MHSA. Additional performance indicators established shall also be subject to the process described in subparagraph (C) and shall include consideration of when data on the additional performance indicators would be available for reporting, if not already available.
9794
98-(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, agency may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.
95+(E) If, during subsequent reviews, there is sufficient reason to establish statewide performance standards for one or more outcome measures, the agency, in consultation with the workgroup, may establish those standards for each of the agreed-upon outcome measures.
9996
100-(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, and identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.
97+(2) (A) The county MHSA self-assessment component of the MHSA-OAR, as established by the workgroup, shall require the county behavioral health agencies to assess their performance on the established process and outcome measures that comprise the performance indicators, identify the strengths and weaknesses in their current practice and resource deployment, identify and describe how local operational decisions and systemic factors affect program outcomes, and consider areas of focus that may be included in the county MHSA system improvement plan, as described in paragraph (3). The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be designed to identify areas of best practices for replication and for system improvement at the county level, and shall guide the development of the county MHSA system improvement plan.
10198
102-(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five three years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.
99+(B) (i) The county MHSA self-assessment process shall be completed every five years by the county, in consultation and collaboration with local stakeholders, and submitted to the agency.
103100
104101 (ii) Local stakeholders shall include county behavioral health directors, supervisors, and caseworkers; current and former MHSA service recipients; and county behavioral health agency partners. To the extent possible and relevant, local stakeholders shall also include representatives of tribal organizations and the local behavioral health board. Additional specific county behavioral health agency partners shall be determined by the county and may include, but are not limited to, adult education providers, providers of services for survivors of domestic violence, the local housing continuum of care, county human service departments, county drug and alcohol programs, community-based service providers, and organizations that represent MHSA recipients, as appropriate.
105102
106103 (3) (A) (i) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall, at a minimum, describe how the county will improve its MHSA program performance in strategic focus areas based upon information learned through the county MHSA self-assessment process. The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include the uniform elements established by the workgroup pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c).
107104
108-(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five three years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.
105+(ii) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall be completed every five years by the county, approved in public session by the countys board of supervisors or, as applicable, chief elected official, and be submitted to the agency.
109106
110-(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, conducted by peer counties, the purpose of which shall be is to provide additional insight insight, such as collaborative training on best practices, and technical assistance by peer counties.
107+(B) The county MHSA system improvement plan shall include an MHSA services peer review element, the purpose of which shall be to provide additional insight and technical assistance by peer counties.
111108
112109 (C) Strategic focus areas for the county MHSA system improvement plan shall be determined by the county, informed by the county MHSA self-assessment process, as described in paragraph (2), with targets for improvement based upon what is learned in the county MHSA self-assessment process.
113110
114-
115-
116-(D)
117-
118-
119-
120-(C) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.
111+(D) The county behavioral health agency shall complete an annual progress report on the status of its system improvement plan and shall submit these reports to the agency.
121112
122113 (e) (1) The agency shall receive, review, and, based on its determination of whether the county MHSA system improvement plan meets the required elements, certify as complete all county-submitted performance indicator data, county MHSA self-assessments, county MHSA system improvement plans, and annual progress reports, and shall identify and promote the replication of best practices in MHSA service delivery to achieve the established process and outcome measures.
123114
124-(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures performance indicators developed pursuant to subdivision (d).
115+(2) The agency shall monitor, on an ongoing basis, county performance on the measures developed pursuant to subdivision (d).
125116
126-(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures performance indicators during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.
117+(3) The agency shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the Legislature that summarizes county performance on the established process and outcome measures during the reporting period, analyzes county performance trends over time, and makes findings and recommendations for common MHSA services improvements identified in the county MHSA self-assessments and county MHSA system improvement plans, including information on common statutory, regulatory, or fiscal barriers identified as inhibiting system improvements and any recommendations to overcome those barriers.
127118
128-(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan. The agency and the University of California shall not be considered peers in the peer review element and their role shall be limited to providing technical assistance.
119+(4) (A) The agency shall, in partnership with the University of California, if the contract is executed pursuant to subdivision (g), facilitate the provision of technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as part of the peer review that supports the countys selected areas for improvement, as described in its system improvement plan.
129120
130-(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure performance indicator standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.
121+(B) If, in the course of its review of county MHSA system improvement plans and annual updates, or, in the course of its review of regularly submitted performance indicator data, the agency determines that a county is consistently failing to make progress toward its strategic focus areas for improvement or is consistently failing to meet the process measure standard target thresholds established pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d), the agency shall engage the county in a process of targeted technical assistance and support to address and resolve the identified shortcomings.
131122
132123 (f) A county shall execute and fulfill components of its MHSA system improvement plan that can be accomplished with existing resources.
133124
134125 (g) The agency shall request the University of California to enter into a contract with the state to provide all of the following services:
135126
136127 (1) (A) Prepare an analysis of how data pertaining to the provision of mental health services and client outcomes collected by the counties and provided to the state may be used to demonstrate the impact of services funded by the Mental Health Services Fund on life outcomes. The analysis shall be delivered to the agency, the Legislature, and the workgroup established pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) on or before July 1, 2024, and shall include both of the following:
137128
138-(i) Recommendations of what outcomes outcomes, as part of the performance indicators, should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.
129+(i) Recommendations of what outcomes should be used to measure the impact of the Mental Health Services Act. Recommended life outcome measures shall include measures of the reduction of the negative outcomes described in subdivision (d) of Section 5840, which address prevention and early intervention strategies for mental illness, and measures of employment, educational attainment, program exits and program reentries, adherence to treatment plans, attainment of housing, reduction in contacts with law enforcement, reduction in hospitalizations, and reductions in homelessness.
139130
140-(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.
131+(ii) An estimate of how much an impact funding from the Mental Health Service Services Fund can have on each recommended outcome.
141132
142133 (B) The analysis required to be delivered to the Legislature pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
143134
144-(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome performance indicators as described in this section.
135+(2) Create and maintain a dashboard modeled after the California Child Welfare Indicators Project to publicly report the data collected by counties and to report the status of county process and outcome indicators as described in this section.
145136
146137 (3) Consult with the agency to provide technical assistance to county behavioral health agencies as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (e).
147138
148139 SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
149140
150141 SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
151142
152143 SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
153144
154145 ### SEC. 2.