California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB974

Introduced
2/10/22  
Introduced
2/10/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Vetoed
9/27/22  

Caption

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

Impact

The bill's introduction is part of a broader campaign to improve women's health outcomes by ensuring that financial barriers do not prevent access to essential diagnostic services. By eliminating cost sharing for these procedures, SB 974 seeks to encourage more regular screenings, which can lead to early detection of breast cancer. This is a significant shift in the existing regulatory landscape, as it mandates insurance providers to cover certain services that were previously subject to out-of-pocket costs for patients.

Summary

Senate Bill 974, introduced by Senator Portantino, aims to enhance health care coverage related to diagnostic imaging, specifically for mammography and other breast imaging procedures. The bill requires that health care service plans and disability insurance policies provide coverage for screening mammography and medically necessary diagnostic breast imaging without imposing cost sharing. This provision is especially key for patients at risk for breast cancer and those who may have had abnormal results from prior examinations. The changes will be effective for contracts issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2024.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 974 appears to be positive among health advocates and legislators focused on women's health. Supporters argue that it will significantly reduce barriers to obtaining necessary health screenings, thereby improving health outcomes and potentially saving lives. However, some fiscal conservatives may express concern regarding the implications of mandated coverage on insurance rates and costs to the state and insurers.

Contention

One notable contention is centered around the bill's provision that no reimbursement will be required from the state to local agencies for implementing the changes stipulated by this bill. Critics argue that while enhancing access to care is crucial, the lack of a reimbursement framework may strain local health systems in managing the uptake of these services. Furthermore, concerns regarding potential increases in insurance premiums as a result of expanded coverage options have been raised, reflecting a classic tension between health care access and fiscal responsibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB257

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

CA AB2024

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

NC H297

Breast Cancer Prevention Imaging Parity

DE HB60

An Act To Amend Titles 18, 29, And 31 Relating To Breast Cancer Screening And Diagnostic Procedures.

NC H560

Diagnostic Imaging Parity

IN HB1061

Coverage for cancer screening.