Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission on California State Government Organization and Economy.
Should AB 11 be enacted, it will require the commission to convene quarterly meetings from July 30, 2024, through July 30, 2026, and submit two comprehensive reports outlining their findings and recommendations by August 31, 2025. This could lead to tangible policy recommendations aimed at addressing aspects such as affordable housing, food insecurity, and stagnant wages. Moreover, the bill emphasizes cooperation among all levels of government to make California more livable and economically sustainable for its residents.
AB 11, known as the Milton Marks Little Hoover Commission on California State Government Organization and Economy, aims to address the critical issue of the rising cost of living in California. The bill requires the commission to conduct an in-depth study of the various factors contributing to this issue, with a focus on preserving and supporting the state's middle-class population and enhancing upward mobility for individuals and families living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. The legislation recognizes the pressing challenge of affordable housing alongside the increasing wealth and racial disparities within the state.
The sentiment surrounding AB 11 appears largely supportive among legislators and advocacy groups who have voiced their concerns regarding the high cost of living and its impact on marginalized communities. Many see the establishment of a commission focused on these critical issues as a proactive approach to mitigating economic disparities. However, there may be mixed opinions involving the effectiveness and implementation of the proposed solutions, particularly regarding how these recommendations may be enacted into policy and the potential for bureaucratic delays.
Notable points of contention may arise around the resources required for the study and the prioritization of the issues being investigated. Critics could argue that the commission should focus more on immediate housing solutions rather than prolonged studies. There are also concerns regarding the political feasibility of implementing any recommended measures, especially in the context of California's current housing crisis and varying interests among legislative representatives.