California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1167

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
7/3/23  
Report Pass
7/3/23  
Refer
7/3/23  
Refer
8/21/23  
Report Pass
9/5/23  
Report Pass
9/5/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
10/7/23  
Chaptered
10/7/23  
Passed
10/7/23  

Caption

Oil and gas: acquisition: bonding requirements.

Impact

The introduction of AB1167 represents an essential shift in the management of oil and gas operations in California, particularly regarding environmental responsibilities. With approximately 107,000 active and idle wells in the state, and more than 5,000 identified as at risk of becoming orphaned, this bill aims to enforce accountability on operators by ensuring they carry adequate financial responsibility. This change seeks to mitigate future state liabilities, ensuring that operators cannot transfer wells without demonstrating adequate financial assurance for their eventual decommissioning and site restoration.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1167, introduced by Wendy Carrillo, addresses the acquisition of oil and gas wells and production facilities by imposing new bonding requirements. Under existing law, individuals acquiring rights to operate such facilities need to submit an indemnity bond to ensure compliance with decommissioning and site restoration expenses. AB1167 expands on these requirements, mandating that these bonds be sufficient to cover all costs associated with the plugging, abandonment, and decommissioning of the wells. This means that operators must first request a bond amount determination before proceeding with their acquisition, aiming to reduce the state's financial liabilities stemming from orphaned wells.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding the bill has been supportive among environmental advocates and regulatory bodies who view it as a necessary step for protecting California's natural resources and public funds. However, it may face opposition from industry stakeholders due to the increased costs and regulatory requirements imposed on operators. The debate centers on balancing resource extraction's economic benefits with environmental responsibilities and ensuring effective management of idle and abandoned wells.

Contention

Notable contention areas include the implications of stricter bonding requirements on smaller operators who may find the financial burdens challenging, particularly in a state working towards a decarbonized economy. The bill's provision allowing the supervisor to approve alternative financial assurances, such as irrevocable letters of credit or trust funds, seeks to provide flexibility, but concerns linger regarding the adequacy of enforcement and monitoring of these new provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1057

Oil and gas: Geologic Energy Management Division: wells and facilities: disposition and acquisition notices: indemnity bonds and remediation: additional security: civil penalty.

CA SB724

Oil and gas: wells and production facilities.

CA SB1433

Gravity-Based Energy Storage Well Pilot Program.

CA AB1866

Oil and gas: idle wells.

CA SB84

Oil and gas wells: hazardous or idle-deserted wells and facilities.

CA SB1346

Surplus medication collection and distribution.

CA SB1012

Oil and gas wells: hazardous or idle-deserted wells and facilities.