California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1182

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/20/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
8/14/23  

Caption

Energy: Decarbonization Funding Plan.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1182 will establish provisions for GO-Biz to identify and promote decarbonization funding opportunities at both federal and state levels. This includes the creation of an online portal by July 1, 2024, to increase accessibility to relevant funding information and streamline grant application processes. The bill also mandates annual reporting on identified awards and funding opportunities to ensure transparency and compliance with California’s climate change objectives.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1182, introduced by Assembly Member Petrie-Norris, seeks to create a Decarbonization Funding Plan through the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz). This legislation aims to align state financial incentives with federal funding sources from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). By assessing opportunities for co-funding and streamlining access to federal funds, the bill intends to support California’s ambitious climate goals, including achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2045.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1182 is largely positive among environmental advocates and business supporters who see the potential for enhanced funding to drive green technologies and energy-efficient projects. However, sentiments are mixed among local governance entities who may perceive this as a top-down approach that could limit their autonomy over local energy initiatives and funding allocations. The bill underscores a critical dialogue about the balance between state direction and local control in addressing climate challenges.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential bureaucratic overload in managing federal funds and the concerns from local agencies regarding the implications for local energy project funding. Opponents fear that the centralization of decision-making could lead to a one-size-fits-all approach that may not adequately reflect local priorities or needs, particularly in unique regions across California. There is also an ongoing debate on the efficiency and speed of fund distribution, with advocates calling for expedited processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1075

Hydrogen: green hydrogen: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA SB18

Hydrogen: green hydrogen: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA SB1182

Master Plan for Healthy, Sustainable, and Climate-Resilient Schools.

CA SB394

Master Plan for Healthy, Sustainable, and Climate-Resilient Schools.