California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1248

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/13/23  
Report Pass
6/13/23  
Refer
6/13/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/21/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Vetoed
10/7/23  

Caption

Local redistricting: independent redistricting commissions.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1248 is expected to significantly alter the dynamics of how district boundaries are drawn in California, moving away from traditional methods that might be influenced by political considerations. By utilizing independent commissions, the bill intends to promote fairness and transparency in the redistricting process. It would require public hearings and provide a structured methodology for selecting commission members, ensuring broader representation and community involvement in the decision-making process.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1248 focuses on establishing independent redistricting commissions in various local jurisdictions after each federal decennial census. This legislation mandates that counties and cities with populations exceeding 300,000, as well as school districts and community colleges with over 500,000 residents, create these commissions to oversee the redistricting process. The bill is aimed at ensuring that district boundaries are drawn impartially and reflect the diversity of the local population, thereby enhancing the integrity of the electoral process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1248 appears largely positive among proponents who view it as a step towards ensuring democratic fairness and accountability. Supporters argue that independent commissions will reduce gerrymandering and increase public trust in the electoral process. However, there is some concern among opponents about potential bureaucratic complexities and the efficacy of these commissions in adequately representing all local interests.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding the bill includes debates about the qualifications and selection process for commission members, ensuring they are truly representative of the local population's demographics. Additionally, there are discussions about the bill's approach to local autonomy versus state mandates, particularly concerning jurisdiction sizes and the ability to enact independent redistricting. The exemptions for certain counties and charter cities further complicate the full uniformity that the bill seeks to achieve.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB139

Independent redistricting commissions.

CA AB764

Local redistricting.

CA SB1018

Elections: state and local reapportionment.