California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1280

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Engrossed
4/10/23  
Engrossed
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
4/10/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Enrolled
6/29/23  
Enrolled
6/29/23  
Chaptered
7/21/23  
Chaptered
7/21/23  
Passed
7/21/23  

Caption

Fire hazard severity zones: disclosures.

Impact

The passage of AB 1280 signifies a critical update to real property law in California, tightening the existing standards for hazard disclosures. By requiring more detailed information about fire hazard severity zones on natural hazard disclosure statements, the bill seeks to ensure that potential homebuyers are adequately informed about the risks associated with a given property. This law stands to impact real estate transactions significantly, particularly in regions prone to wildfires, where buyers may be more hesitant to purchase properties without full knowledge of their associated risks.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1280, authored by Maienschein, amends Section 1103.2 of the California Civil Code, updating the requirements around disclosures for sellers of single-family residential properties located in fire hazard severity zones. The bill mandates that sellers specify whether their property is situated in a high or very high fire hazard severity zone within a natural hazard disclosure statement. This enhanced disclosure aims to better inform prospective buyers about the risks associated with purchasing property in these areas, thereby promoting safety and awareness regarding wildfire risks as climate conditions have led to an increase in fire hazards across the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 1280 has been supportive, as it aligns with broader efforts to enhance public safety in light of increasing wildfire incidents. Legislators and advocates for consumer protection highlighted the importance of transparency in real estate transactions, arguing that informed buyers are better equipped to make decisions that prioritize safety. While the bill received bipartisan support, some industry stakeholders raised concerns about the potential for increased liabilities and the administrative burden it may impose on sellers and real estate agents.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the detailed requirements for disclosure and the potential implications for sellers. Critics voiced concerns that the enhanced disclosures could lead to a decrease in property sales in high-risk areas due to buyer hesitance. Furthermore, practical challenges regarding how sellers will be able to verify their property’s fire hazard status were discussed, emphasizing the need for clarity and support from state agencies in adapting to these new requirements. Overall, while the sentiment is generally in favor of increased safety measures, there are ongoing discussions about the balance between safety awareness and the practicalities of real estate transactions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1289

Real property disclosure requirements.

OR HB3944

Relating to wildfire; declaring an emergency.

OR SB83

Relating to wildfire; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3526

Relating to exempt wells that supply water for domestic purposes.

CT HB05321

An Act Concerning The Written Residential Disclosure Report, The Captive Insurance Company Established For Assisting With Crumbling Foundations And Funding For Lead Removal, Remediation And Abatement.

CA AB1626

Real estate brokers: dual agency.