California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1293

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/17/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Report Pass
5/17/23  
Engrossed
5/25/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/19/23  
Report Pass
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/13/23  

Caption

Interconnection: prioritization.

Impact

The bill will alter existing state laws governing electricity service extensions by creating legally binding requirements for the Public Utilities Commission. Due to this new requirement, any violation of the commission’s orders would be deemed a crime, thus establishing a state-mandated local program. The bill does not require reimbursement to local agencies or school districts for costs incurred due to the creation of this new crime, which may pose challenges for local governance and funding.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1293, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, focuses on the interconnection of electricity services in California. It mandates the California Public Utilities Commission to issue guidance by January 1, 2025, regarding the prioritization of projects within the distribution interconnection queue of electrical corporations. The bill emphasizes prioritizing customer service connections, especially those that are shovel-ready, meaning they are near completion and ready for construction. This directive aims to streamline processes and potentially accelerate service extensions.

Sentiment

Reception of AB 1293 among lawmakers and industry stakeholders appears to be cautiously optimistic, with proponents highlighting the necessity of efficient service delivery and the benefits of having a clear prioritization framework. However, some opposition has surfaced regarding the implications of a new crime associated with non-compliance, raising concerns about the extra burden placed on local regulatory bodies and potential overreach in state control over local matters.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between state and local authorities. Critics argue that by imposing new regulations without reimbursement for managing the repercussions, the state could be overstepping its authority. The debate underscores the tension between ensuring prompt utility service enhancements and maintaining local regulatory autonomy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB83

Public utilities: electrical distribution grid: energization.

CA SB410

Powering Up Californians Act.

CA AB914

Electrical infrastructure: California Environmental Quality Act: review time period.

CA SB284

Electricity: energization transparency and efficiency: wholesale distribution service.

CA SB1440

Energy: biomethane: biomethane procurement.

CA AB843

California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program: renewable feed-in tariff: Bioenergy Market Adjusting Tariff program: community choice aggregators.

CA SB57

Electrical corporations: tariffs.

CA AB691

Inefficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems at schools: report.