California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1381

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  

Caption

Employment protections: call centers.

Impact

The introduction of AB 1381 seeks to bolster local employment opportunities by limiting the outsourcing of call center jobs to foreign or out-of-state entities. By mandating that a significant majority of call center operations occur within California, the bill aims to help maintain job security, potentially raise wages for these positions, and contribute to local economic stability. Furthermore, the bill intends to ensure that public service contracts contribute to the state economy through employment, rather than allowing revenue to funnel out of the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1381, introduced by Assembly Member Weber, is a legislative measure aimed at enhancing employment protections specifically for call center workers in California. The bill mandates that by January 1, 2026, at least 90% of the call center work for state agencies must be conducted within California, except under certain specified conditions. It also stipulates that for new contracts executed on or after January 1, 2027, no less than 75% of call center work must be performed in the state. Existing contracts will require that at least 50% of call center jobs are based in California.

Sentiment

Reactions to AB 1381 have been mixed. Supporters, primarily labor advocates, argue that the bill is an essential step toward protecting workers and ensuring fair labor practices in an industry often criticized for its treatment of employees. However, opponents express concerns that imposing such regulations could limit the flexibility of state agencies and lead to higher costs for contracts, possibly affecting the quality and efficiency of public services. The debate highlights tensions between job protection for local workers and the operational needs of state agencies to deliver services efficiently.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential drawbacks of the bill, specifically regarding operational disruptions in case of disasters or overflow situations, which the bill does accommodate through specific exceptions. Critics worry that such flexibility might be exploited to circumvent the intention of keeping call center jobs within the state. Additionally, the establishment of scoring incentives for contractors wishing to comply with these new regulations is seen as a potential bureaucratic hurdle that could complicate the contracting process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2068

State agencies: call center work: reporting information.

CA AB1601

Employment protections: mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees: call centers.

CA AB1677

Call centers: protections.

CA AB2317

Call centers: protections.

CA AB1832

Waters subject to tidal influence: hard mineral extraction.

CA AB345

Habitat restoration: flood control: advance payments.

CA SB1285

Navigable waters: hazardous, medical, or human waste.