California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1389

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
6/5/23  
Report Pass
6/5/23  
Refer
6/5/23  
Refer
6/5/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Chaptered
10/13/23  
Passed
10/13/23  

Caption

Notice of levy.

Impact

The potential impact of AB1389 on state laws includes addressing the increased burden on financial institutions and improving the efficacy of debt collection processes for the Employment Development Department (EDD). By modifying the timeframe for compliance, the bill aims to provide clearer guidelines for both financial institutions and individuals who are responsible for remitting owed amounts to the state, thus streamlining the enforcement of tax liens and delinquent contributions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1389, introduced by Wendy Carrillo, proposes amendments to Section 1755 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, which regulates the process surrounding the collection of delinquent unemployment insurance payments. Traditionally, existing law mandated that financial institutions remit property subject to a levy within five days of receiving notice. However, AB1389 shifts the timeline, extending the remittance requirement to between ten and fourteen business days. This allows entities in possession of credits or property additional time to comply with such levies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1389 appears to be supportive among legislators concerned with improving the efficiency of the unemployment insurance collection process. There is an acknowledgment of the need to balance the rights of financial institutions and the enforcement of state claims. However, some concerns may arise from those wary of additional complications in compliance, particularly how this could affect small businesses and individuals who may not have the capacity to react quickly in a changing financial landscape.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the adjustments to compliance timeframes and the implications for those facing unemployment-related claims. Critics may argue that extending the remittance period might inadvertently delay the collection of owed funds, thus impacting the EDD's ability to manage its resources effectively. On the other hand, proponents may see this as a pragmatic approach that reduces immediate stress on institutions while ensuring compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2633

Public contracts: county-owned buildings.

CA AB1696

Insurance omnibus: developmental services.

UT HB0100

Workforce Development Funding Amendments

UT HB0559

Workforce Development Funding Amendments

CA SB898

Enforcement of judgments: exemptions.

KS SB27

Reconciling multiple amendments to certain statutes.

CA SB996

CalWORKs eligibility.

NM SB216

Bankruptcy Exemptions