Firearms: waiting periods.
The implications of AB 1406 are significant for state laws surrounding firearm sales. By increasing the potential waiting period and emphasizing comprehensive background checks, the legislation aims to bolster firearms safety. Should the DOJ determine that a firearm being sold is lost or stolen, the dealer is required to reject the sale and notify law enforcement, thus reinforcing laws against the circulation of stolen firearms. This change not only aims to protect public safety but also creates a more stringent regulatory framework for firearm transactions in California.
Assembly Bill 1406, relating to firearms and waiting periods, amends Section 28220 of the Penal Code. This bill primarily focuses on regulating the sale and transfer of firearms, specifically enhancing the waiting period before a firearm can be delivered to a purchaser. Under existing law, firearms dealers are required to wait 10 days after a purchase application before delivering a firearm. AB 1406 strengthens this by allowing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to request extended delays up to 30 days for additional background checks under certain circumstances, such as during emergencies.
The general sentiment surrounding AB 1406 appears largely supportive among advocates for gun control and public safety, as it emphasizes thorough background checks and accountability for lost or stolen firearms. Supporters argue that such measures could help prevent firearms from falling into potentially dangerous hands. Conversely, some opponents express concerns about increased regulatory burdens on gun sellers and purchasers, fearing that extended waiting times may infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners.
Notable points of contention include the balance between public safety measures and constitutional rights regarding gun ownership. While proponents emphasize the necessity of safeguarding citizens from gun violence, critics argue the bill may lead to unnecessary delays in legal firearm purchases, complicating access for law-abiding citizens. The debate reflects broader discussions within the state regarding the efficacy of gun control measures and the rights afforded to gun owners.