California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1628

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
8/28/23  
Refer
8/28/23  
Report Pass
9/5/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Vetoed
10/8/23  

Caption

Microfiber filtration.

Impact

The bill's enforcement is expected to significantly reduce the emission of synthetic microfibers into California's waterways, which contribute to a growing pollution problem. With an estimated 11 million residential and 600,000 commercial washing machines currently in the state, compliance with AB 1628 could result in a drastic decrease in microfiber leaks into the environment. Studies suggest that the adoption of filtration technologies can reduce microfiber emissions by up to 80%, potentially leading to better ecological outcomes.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1628, introduced by Assembly Member McKinnor, seeks to address the environmental crisis posed by microplastics, particularly those shed from synthetic textiles during laundry. The bill mandates that all new washing machines sold in California after January 1, 2029, must include a microfiber filtration system designed to capture microfibers with a mesh size not exceeding 100 micrometers. This initiative is part of a broader legislative effort to control plastic pollution and improve water quality throughout the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1628 appears largely positive among environmental advocates and legislators who recognize the pressing need to address plastic pollution. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step toward safeguarding public health and the environment. However, there may be some contention regarding the cost implications for manufacturers and consumers, especially in discussions about the financial burden of implementing these filtration systems.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the feasibility for washing machine manufacturers to integrate such filtration systems into existing models, and potential resistance from industry stakeholders who may perceive the requirements as regulatory overreach. Additionally, discussions highlight the challenges posed by existing wastewater treatment facilities, which may not be equipped to handle the increased demands for monitoring and compliance with new filtration requirements, raising questions about the overall readiness of the system to implement these changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2214

Ocean Protection Council: microplastics.

CA AB129

Microfiber pollution.

CA AB2379

Waste management: plastic microfiber.

NJ A1482

Directs DEP to establish rebate program for purchase of microfiber washing machine filter or replacement filter; appropriates $2.5 million.

IL HB1284

EPA-MICROFIBER FILTRATION

CA AB802

Microfiber pollution.

CA AB1952

Washing machines: microfiber filters: state laundry facilities: pilot program.

CA AB2297

Microfiber pollution.