California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1703

Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/16/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  

Caption

State Athletic Commission: boxing.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the Boxers Pension Fund, which is sourced from the financial contributions linked to boxing matches. With the new financial ceilings, it ensures that a larger share of boxing revenues can be accounted under the commission while also maintaining ongoing revenue for pension-related activities. This aims to enhance financial stability for boxers post-retirement, bolstering their support after their active careers in the sport.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1703, introduced by Wendy Carrillo, amends Section 18824 of the Business and Professions Code, particularly focusing on regulations surrounding boxing contests and the associated revenue requirements for the State Athletic Commission. Under the existing framework of the Boxing Act, the bill raises the limits of gross receipts from $2 million to $4 million for the boxers' reporting requirements. Additionally, it alters the maximum fee from $100,000 to $200,000 for admissions collected during such contests, creating a new structure governing the financial operational framework for boxing activities within California.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1703 appears largely supportive among those concerned with the welfare of professional boxers, as it aims to increase the financial protections available to them. This indicates a commitment to the sustainability of the Boxers Pension Fund. Conversely, there may be trepidations within the promoter and manager communities regarding the increased financial reporting and obligations associated with higher thresholds—a concern that reflects ongoing debates about governmental oversight versus industry autonomy.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention lies in the significant raises in financial thresholds set out in the amendments. While proponents advocate for the enhanced welfare of boxers through better pension provisions and increased reporting, critics may argue that the elevated financial requirements could disproportionately burden smaller promoters or newly established operations, creating hurdles that could limit participation in the sport at various levels.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK HB3315

Amusements and sports; Oklahoma State Athletic Commission; term; funds; assistant; reimbursement; fee; effective date.

OK HB1387

Amusements and sports; Oklahoma State Athletic Commission; term; requirement; funds; assistant; reimbursement limits; effective date.

OK HB1387

Amusements and sports; Oklahoma State Athletic Commission; term; requirement; funds; assistant; reimbursement limits; effective date.

OK HB1783

Amusements and sports; authorizing the Oklahoma State Athletic Commission to assume jurisdiction over amateur kickboxing; effective date.

CA SB37

Attorneys: unlawful solicitations and advertisements.

CA AB249

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

OH HB367

Regards unauthorized use of an individual's persona, deepfakes

MS HB1689

Election crime; create for dissemination of a deep fake within 90 days of an election.