California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1794

Introduced
1/4/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
4/15/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/11/24  
Refer
6/11/24  
Refer
6/11/24  
Refer
8/5/24  

Caption

Crimes: larceny.

Impact

The bill is perceived as a direct response to concerns about rising retail theft and organized crime. By enabling retailers to report theft incidents more efficiently and allowing for streamlined evaluations of such reports, the bill aims to bolster law enforcement's ability to address these crimes effectively. It also introduces a program, the 'CAL-Fast Pass Program', which allows counties to collaborate with retailers in prosecuting theft, suggesting a shift towards a more punitive approach on theft-related offenses.

Summary

AB1794 proposes amendments to the Penal Code regarding crimes of larceny and theft, particularly in the context of retail. Key changes include clarifications around the aggregation of theft values, allowing for multiple thefts committed in different locations or from various victims to be combined into a single charge of grand theft, provided they are motivated by one intention. This reform aims to address the challenges in prosecuting organized retail theft while also maintaining transparency in how such crimes are handled legally.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1794 seems to be mixed. Proponents, primarily from law enforcement and retail sectors, argue that its provisions will enhance community safety and reduce store losses due to theft. However, some advocacy groups express concern that the bill’s measures could disproportionately affect low-income individuals and overlook the socioeconomic factors contributing to retail theft, arguing for a more rehabilitative rather than punitive approach.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's implications for the justice system, particularly how it may change the landscape of prosecuting theft crimes. Critics argue that while the bill aims to capture a broader range of theft scenarios, it could lead to increased incarceration rates for minor offenses under the guise of curbing significant theft. Additionally, the requirement for counties to evaluate the impact of these new submissions presents logistical challenges and raises questions about accountability in law enforcement's handling of theft cases.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2943

Crimes: shoplifting.

CA AB1787

Theft: shoplifting.

CA AB23

Theft: shoplifting: amount.

CA SB1381

Crimes: child pornography.

CA AB1603

Theft: shoplifting: amount.

CA AB2390

Theft: aggregation of amounts and diversion.

CA AB1065

Theft: aggregation: organized retail theft.

CA AB335

Retail theft.