California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB185

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
4/12/23  

Caption

Budget Act of 2023.

Impact

The going-forward implications of AB 185 suggest a significant focus on budgetary oversight and management for California's state government. By expressing the intent to legislate relevant changes, the bill ensures that budgetary resources are allocated efficiently and in a manner that reflects the evolving needs of the state. This could lead to adjustments in funding priorities that might impact various sectors, from health to infrastructure, thereby shaping the economic landscape of California for the fiscal year.

Summary

Assembly Bill 185, known as the Budget Act of 2023, was introduced by Assembly Member Ting and aims to align state budget processes for the year. The bill reflects the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes associated with the allocation and management of state funds. Although the specific changes have not been detailed in the bill text, it indicates the legislative body's commitment to addressing fiscal responsibilities and regulations as part of the state's budgetary framework for the upcoming year.

Sentiment

The prevailing sentiment around AB 185 appears to be supportive, especially given its foundational role in structuring the state budget. Legislators and stakeholders likely view this initiative as critical in ensuring that the state's financial commitments are met and that necessary funds are appropriately managed. However, as with any budget-related bill, some concern may arise regarding the specifics of the allocations and the potential trade-offs involved in funding different programs and services.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding AB 185 may involve discussions on prioritization within the budget allocations. Critics could argue that certain areas may not receive adequate funding or that the intent of the legislation leaves too much ambiguity regarding implementation. Ensuring that local projects and services are not overshadowed by broader state priorities could be a central theme in debates regarding the bill's provisions, especially considering California's diverse population and varying regional needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance