California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1852

Introduced
1/17/24  
Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/4/24  
Report Pass
6/4/24  
Enrolled
6/10/24  
Enrolled
6/10/24  
Chaptered
6/26/24  
Chaptered
6/26/24  
Passed
6/26/24  

Caption

Joint powers agencies: Clean Power Alliance of Southern California: meetings.

Impact

The amendment reinforces the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, which mandates open and public meetings for local agencies while allowing for specified closed session exceptions. By extending the confidentiality terms surrounding information discussed in closed sessions, this bill brings clarity to how legislative bodies may handle sensitive information, thereby fostering strategic discussions within the governance framework of the Clean Power Alliance.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1852, introduced by Pacheco, represents an amendment to Section 54956.96 of the Government Code, specifically addressing the operations of the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California concerning closed sessions within joint powers agencies. The Bill extends the repeal date of existing provisions governing closed session conduct from January 1, 2025, to January 1, 2030. This extension is aimed at ensuring continuity in the governance of joint powers agencies while also addressing unique operational needs that may arise due to the specific governmental structure involved in the Clean Power Alliance.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB 1852 appears to be supportive, as it aims to maintain a level of confidentiality necessary for effective governance. Lawmakers recognize the importance of enabling joint powers agencies like the Clean Power Alliance to operate efficiently, without suffering interruptions due to legislative expiration of rules that facilitate their operations.

Contention

While the bill seems to have garnered broad support among legislators, notable points of contention could arise from stakeholders who prioritize transparency. Concerns may stem from the extension of confidentiality provisions, as critics could argue this may inhibit public oversight and diminish accountability. However, supporters contend that the necessity of confidentiality is paramount for sensitive discussions that influence financial and operational decisions within joint powers agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB355

Joint powers agencies: Clean Power Alliance of Southern California: meetings.

CA SB410

Powering Up Californians Act.

CA AB1379

Open meetings: local agencies: teleconferences.

CA AB557

Open meetings: local agencies: teleconferences.

CA SB302

Joint powers agencies: Orange County Fire Authority: funds.

CA AB259

Open meetings: local agencies: teleconferences.

CA AB1505

California Earthquake Authority: closed meetings.

CA AB2449

Open meetings: local agencies: teleconferences.

CA AB2302

Open meetings: local agencies: teleconferences.

CA AB1845

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: alternative project delivery methods.

Similar Bills

CA SB355

Joint powers agencies: Clean Power Alliance of Southern California: meetings.

CA SB332

Investor-Owned Utilities Accountability Act.

CA AB1195

Limited Eligibility and Appointment Program: lists.

CA AB2607

Tidelands and submerged lands: City and County of San Francisco: Port of San Francisco.

CA SB1029

North Coast Railroad Authority.

CA SB69

North Coast Railroad Authority: Great Redwood Trail Agency: rail rights-of-way: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District.

CA SB480

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: rules: inappropriate conduct.

CA AB291

Teachers: credentialed educator apprenticeship programs.