California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB193

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Introduced
1/9/23  
Introduced
1/9/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  

Caption

Budget Act of 2023.

Impact

The bill seeks to amend existing state budgetary protocols and may result in changes that directly affect how the state manages its finances. By expressing an intent to enact statute changes related to the Budget Act, the bill is likely to lead to adjustments in funding allocations across various sectors, aligning them with the state’s evolving economic strategies. This can impact areas such as infrastructure, education, and health services, promoting potential advancements in state resource distribution.

Summary

Assembly Bill 193, also known as the Budget Act of 2023, is a legislative proposal introduced by Assembly Member Ting. The main objective of the bill is to express the intent of the California Legislature to enact changes concerning the fiscal policy for the state. This bill is part of the annual process of approving and regulating state expenditures, ensuring that the financial strategies sync with legislative priorities. Its introduction signifies a proactive approach to revising the financial framework to meet current economic needs and priorities of the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 193 appears to be supportive among many legislators, especially those within the budgeting committee, who understand the necessity of flexibility and responsiveness within state fiscal management. However, there could be underlying concerns from opposition members about the implications of such budgetary control and the potential for reduced investment in critical areas that require special attention, resulting in a cautiously optimistic perspective on the bill’s applications.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 193 involve discussions surrounding the prioritization of state funding and the implications of enacting budgetary changes. Critics may raise concerns about whether the bill adequately addresses the needs of various communities or if it primarily favors urban areas over rural constituents. Furthermore, some stakeholders might argue that certain local programs could be jeopardized without proper oversight or adherence to previous commitments within the budget framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance