California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1949

Introduced
1/29/24  
Introduced
1/29/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Vetoed
9/28/24  

Caption

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2020: collection of personal information of a consumer less than 18 years of age.

Impact

The impact of AB 1949 on state laws is significant as it adjusts the provisions of the CCPA to better safeguard minors. By prohibiting the sale or sharing of personal information from consumers who are under 18 years unless explicitly authorized by parents or guardians, the bill fortifies the legal framework around privacy rights for youths. This change could significantly affect how businesses across California operate concerning their data collection practices, leading to potential compliance challenges and necessitating adjustments to voluntary and involuntary information sharing protocols.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1949, introduced by Assembly Member Wicks, amends the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) of 2020, specifically focusing on the collection and handling of personal information from consumers under 18 years of age. The bill raises the age threshold at which businesses can sell or share personal data without explicit consent, shifting the limit from 16 years old to 18. This development is aimed at enhancing privacy protections for minors and requires businesses to uphold stricter guidelines concerning the sale of sensitive personal information.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1949 appears to be generally positive among advocates of youth protection and privacy rights, who commend the bill for taking necessary steps to enhance the privacy rights of minors. However, there may be concerns from businesses regarding increased operational burdens and compliance costs. Overall, public support seems to resonate with calls for greater consumer protection, particularly for younger individuals who might be more vulnerable to data exploitation.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to AB 1949 may arise over the balance between consumer protection and the operational realities of businesses in the digital age. Some critics could argue that the heightened restrictions may impede legitimate business practices and limit innovation in data use and marketing strategies. Furthermore, questions may arise concerning how effectively businesses can verify the age of users, and the potential consequences of erroneous age classification could pose significant challenges.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3286

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: monetary thresholds: grants.

CA AB2877

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: artificial intelligence: training.

CA SB1223

Consumer privacy: sensitive personal information: neural data.

CA AB1194

California Privacy Rights Act of 2020: exemptions: abortion services.

CA AB1355

Personal information.

CA AB694

Privacy and Consumer Protection: omnibus bill.

CA SB1121

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

CA AB1760

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.