California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1982

Introduced
1/30/24  
Introduced
1/30/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Refer
2/12/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/12/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/28/24  
Report Pass
5/28/24  
Refer
5/28/24  
Refer
5/28/24  
Report Pass
6/25/24  
Report Pass
6/25/24  
Enrolled
7/1/24  
Enrolled
7/1/24  
Chaptered
7/18/24  
Passed
7/18/24  

Caption

Firearm safety certificate: exemptions.

Impact

The impact of AB 1982 on state laws is significant because it potentially increases access to firearms for military veterans who may not carry the traditional identification forms previously accepted. By recognizing the Veteran Health Identification Card as valid proof, the bill enhances inclusivity and acknowledges the service of veterans within the regulatory framework surrounding firearm ownership. This change stipulates that veterans will have less bureaucratic burden when obtaining firearms, thereby promoting their rights under the law.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1982, titled 'Firearm safety certificate: exemptions,' aims to amend Section 31700 of the California Penal Code. This legislation expands the current exemptions for individuals required to possess a firearm safety certificate during the purchase or receipt of firearms. The bill specifically adds the Veteran Health Identification Card issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs as an acceptable form of identification, alongside existing cards for active or honorably retired members of the armed forces. This adjustment is intended to facilitate ease of access for veterans when acquiring firearms, ensuring that those who are already established members of the military or law enforcement community can navigate legal requirements more seamlessly.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 1982 appears to be positive among proponents, primarily those who advocate for veterans' rights and firearm accessibility. Supporters argue that it is a logical step in acknowledging the unique needs of veterans and providing them with fair access to their rights. However, there is likely a counter-argument from those concerned about the broader implications of firearm access and safety regulations, hinting at a division between the necessity of regulation and the rights of individuals to own firearms, especially among those who have served in the military.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the debate over the balance between public safety and the rights of individuals to own firearms. Critics may express concerns about expanding exemptions to firearm safety requirements, fearing it could lead to easier access for individuals who may not necessarily meet the same usage standards. Nonetheless, proponents of the bill argue that the legislation specifically seeks to honor military service and offers a practical solution to issues faced by veterans, potentially framing the discourse around respect for those who have served.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1292

Firearms.

CA AB2176

Firearms.

CA SB172

Firearms.

CA SB299

Firearms.

NJ S1125

Criminalizes failure to return erroneous person-to-person electronic payments following proper notification.

NJ A3169

Criminalizes failure to return erroneous person-to-person electronic payments following proper notification.

NJ A2946

Criminalizes failure to return erroneous person-to-person electronic payments following proper notification.