Building standards: exterior elevated elements: inspection.
Under the provisions of AB2114, the requirement for visual inspections of exterior elevated elements is set to occur once every nine years, instead of the current standards. The inspections will assess the condition of these elements to ensure they meet safety standards. The legislation highlights the pressing need for consistent safety checks to prevent accidents stemming from structural failures in residential properties. The bill's urgency clause emphasizes the need for immediate implementation to protect public health and safety.
Assembly Bill No. 2114, introduced by Irwin, aims to amend Section 5551 of the California Civil Code regarding building standards pertaining to exterior elevated elements. This bill specifically addresses the inspection protocols of exterior structures such as balconies and walkways in common interest developments, which are critical for ensuring safety in multifamily residential buildings. The bill allows licensed civil engineers, in addition to structural engineers and architects, to conduct these essential inspections, thereby broadening the pool of qualified professionals who can carry out this task.
The reception of AB2114 in legislative discussions appears to be positive among its supporters, who advocate for stronger safety regulations in residential buildings. Proponents assert that the bill addresses significant safety concerns raised in light of past incidents involving exterior elevated structures. The sentiment among opponents is less clear, although there could be concerns about costs burdens placed on associations responsible for these inspections. Overall, the sentiment seems to tilt towards supporting enhanced safety measures for residents.
While the bill primarily aims to improve safety standards through mandated inspections, there are points of contention regarding the implications for condominium associations. The financial implications of regular inspections and necessary repairs may raise challenges for these associations, especially in terms of maintaining compliance. Additionally, the ability for local governments to impose stricter regulations poses questions about the standardization of safety measures across different jurisdictions, potentially leading to debates about uniformity versus local control.