California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2165

Introduced
2/6/24  
Introduced
2/6/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Report Pass
3/18/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
6/19/24  
Refer
7/1/24  
Refer
7/1/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Chaptered
9/27/24  
Chaptered
9/27/24  
Passed
9/27/24  

Caption

Pupil instruction: financial aid application.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2165 will impose new duties on local educational agencies by requiring them to inform pupils and their parents or guardians of the implications of opting out of the FAFSA requirement. Prior to exempting a student from submitting these applications, schools must provide detailed information about the benefits of financial aid and what opting out entails, effectively increasing the transparency of the financial aid application process. This procedural modification aims to assist more high school seniors in accessing financial resources necessary for their college education.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2165, introduced by Reyes, aims to amend the Education Code with respect to the procedural responsibilities of local educational agencies regarding the financial aid applications of high school seniors. The legislation mandates that school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education ensure that each eligible twelfth-grade pupil completes and submits a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) or, if applicable, a California Dream Act application. It emphasizes the importance of these applications in accessing financial aid for postsecondary education, especially for students eligible for nonresident tuition exemptions under certain conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2165 appears to be primarily positive, with supporters advocating for increased access to financial aid for students in California. Educators and advocates for educational equity view the bill as a necessary step toward ensuring that all students, particularly those from underserved communities, receive the guidance they need to successfully apply for financial aid. However, there may also be reservations regarding the additional responsibilities placed on local educational agencies amidst existing pressures and resource constraints.

Contention

Notably, opponents might argue that while the intent of the bill is to promote higher educational attainment, it places an additional burden on local educational agencies who must navigate the intricacies of financial aid applications. By requiring explicit communication and administrative actions regarding opt-out procedures, there may be concerns about the implications for funding and staffing, as well as the potential for unintended consequences if schools lack the resources necessary to effectively implement the new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB640

Public postsecondary education: admission, transfer, and enrollment.

CA SB153

Education finance: education omnibus budget trailer bill.

CA AB153

Education finance: education omnibus budget trailer bill.

CA SB77

Higher education trailer bill.

CA SB619

Public postsecondary education.

CA SB835

Pupil instruction: Cambridge International Education programs.

CA AB77

Education finance: education omnibus budget trailer bill.

CA SB1171

Pupil instruction: Cambridge Assessment International Education programs.