California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2173

Introduced
2/7/24  
Introduced
2/7/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Engrossed
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Enrolled
7/3/24  
Enrolled
7/3/24  
Chaptered
7/18/24  
Chaptered
7/18/24  
Passed
7/18/24  

Caption

Special education: emotional disability.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2173 will directly influence how emotional disabilities are identified and addressed within California's educational system. By adopting the term 'emotional disability,' the bill not only aligns California's vernacular with federal standards but arguably enhances the understanding and response to the needs of students experiencing emotional challenges. This could positively affect funding, training, and resources dedicated to special education, fostering a more inclusive environment for affected students.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2173, known as the Special Education: Emotional Disability Act, was introduced with the intent to align California state law terminology with the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The bill specifically proposes that the term 'emotional disturbance' be interchangeable with 'emotional disability' under state law. This change is significant as it reflects a growing recognition of the nuances in emotional and psychological conditions affecting students and aims to improve clarity regarding educational support provided to these students.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2173 appears to be largely positive, as it is seen as a progressive measure to support students with emotional disabilities. Advocates for the bill emphasize the importance of accurate terminology in identifying and helping students who need specialized educational services. However, there may be apprehensions among some stakeholders concerned about the implications of changing established terminologies and ensuring that the transition does not disrupt current educational practices.

Contention

Notably, while the bill received unanimous support during voting, discussions among participants may have highlighted concerns regarding implementation. Critics may argue that changes to such established terms could lead to confusion among educators and administrators. Ensuring consistent interpretation and application of the term across various school districts remains a crucial point for successfully integrating the bill into current educational protocols.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB898

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA AB1658

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA SB1145

Gambling Control Act.

CA AB506

California State University: graduation requirement: ethnic studies.

CA AB209

California State University: Agricultural education: professional doctorate degrees.

CA SB68

Public postsecondary education: exemption from nonresident tuition.

CA AB327

COVID-19 vaccination status: prohibition on required disclosure.

CA AB1749

Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act: University of California.